Radiology, Vol 187, 395-399, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Survey of reproductive health among female MR workers

E Kanal, J Gillen, JA Evans, DA Savitz and FG Shellock
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

Epidemiologic data were obtained to evaluate potential risks from exposure to the static and time-varying magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. A questionnaire sent to women workers in more than 90% of clinical MR facilities in the United States addressed menstrual-reproductive experiences, work activities, and potential confounders (eg, age, smoking, alcohol use). In 1,915 completed questionnaires, 1,421 pregnancies were reported: 280 occurred in an MR worker (technologist or nurse), 894 in an employee in another job, 54 in a student, and 193 in homemakers. Comparing MR-worker pregnancies with those occurring in employees at other jobs, a relative risk ratio of 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-1.77) was found for spontaneous abortions; for conception taking more than 12 months, 0.90 (CI, 0.54-1.51); for delivery before 39 weeks, 1.19 (CI, 0.76- 1.88); for birth weight below 5.5 lb (2.5 kg), 1.01 (CI, 0.50-2.04); and for male gender of the offspring, 0.99 (CI, 0.80-1.22). Adjustment for maternal age, smoking, and alcohol use also failed to markedly change any of the associations. These results suggest that there is not a substantial increase in these common adverse reproductive outcomes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Kanal, A. J. Barkovich, C. Bell, J. P. Borgstede, W. G. Bradley Jr., J. W. Froelich, T. Gilk, J. R. Gimbel, J. Gosbee, E. Kuhni-Kaminski, et al. ACR Guidance Document for Safe MR Practices: 2007 Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1447 - 1474. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Leyendecker, V. Gorengaut, and J. J. Brown MR Imaging of Maternal Diseases of the Abdomen and Pelvis during Pregnancy and the Immediate Postpartum Period RadioGraphics, September 1, 2004; 24(5): 1301 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Keller, A. Rake, S. C. A. Michel, B. Seifert, G. Efe, K. Treiber, R. Huch, B. Marincek, and R. A. Kubik-Huch Obstetric MR Pelvimetry: Reference Values and Evaluation of Inter- and Intraobserver Error and Intraindividual Variability Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 37 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Kanal, J. P. Borgstede, A. J. Barkovich, C. Bell, W. G. Bradley, J. P. Felmlee, J. W. Froelich, E. M. Kaminski, E. K. Keeler, J. W. Lester, et al. American College of Radiology White Paper on MR Safety Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1335 - 1347. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.W. Rae, F.W. Smith, and A.A. Templeton Magnetic resonance imaging of the human cervix: a study of the effects of prostaglandins in the first trimester Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1744 - 1747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Simon, R. B. Goldstein, F. V. Coakley, R. A. Filly, K. C. Broderick, T. J. Musci, and A. J. Barkovich Fast MR Imaging of Fetal CNS Anomalies in Utero AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2000; 21(9): 1688 - 1698. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. Levine, P. D. Barnes, and R. R. Edelman Obstetric MR Imaging Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 609 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. R. Duncan, P. N. Baker, P. A. Gowland, B. Issa, R. Moore, B. Worthington, and I. R. Johnson Demonstration of changes in fetal liver erythropoiesis using echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 1997; 273(4): G965 - G967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]