Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nosher, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nosher, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, R.

Radiology, Vol 187, 649-651, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Percutaneous retrieval of nonvascular foreign bodies

JL Nosher and R Siegel
Department of Radiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick 08903-0019.

Although intravascular foreign bodies are routinely removed with percutaneous extraction, surgical retrieval is performed of most nonvascular foreign bodies. The authors describe six cases in which percutaneous extraction was performed for removal of nonvascular foreign bodies. These foreign bodies included an intraabdominal laparotomy towel, two pelvic drains, an angiographic guidewire fragment in a pelvic abscess cavity, and a superficially located sewing needle and bullet fragment. Computed tomography or plain radiography was performed to define the safest track for percutaneous removal. Fluoroscopy was performed to direct foreign body removal; the major challenge of the procedure was precise localization of the foreign body to minimize dissection. Although a surgeon and operating suite were available for backup care if necessary, all six foreign bodies were removed successfully without complication by the interventional radiologist in the radiology suite. Percutaneous retrieval of nonvascular foreign bodies, while not frequently performed, can in many cases obviate surgical incisions, extensive dissection, and the cost and risk of administration of general anesthesia.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
J L Burton
Health and safety at necropsy
J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2003; 56(4): 254 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumaHome page
J. A. Hyde, M. S Walsh, and T. Graham
Conservative management of penetrating torso trauma
Trauma, July 1, 2000; 2(3): 187 - 197.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.