Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orel, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Troupin, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Orel, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Troupin, R. H.

Radiology, Vol 188, 189-194, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Breast cancer recurrence after lumpectomy and radiation therapy for early-stage disease: prognostic significance of detection method

SG Orel, BL Fowble, LJ Solin, DJ Schultz, EF Conant and RH Troupin
Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

The prognostic implications of detection mode in local recurrence after lumpectomy and radiation therapy were assessed. Seventy-two women treated with lumpectomy and irradiation for American Joint Committee on Cancer stages I and II invasive breast cancer developed recurrent cancer in the ipsilateral breast, had physical examination and mammography performed at the time of recurrence, and underwent salvage mastectomy. There was a statistically significant association between detection with mammography alone and lower T stage (P = .05), and there was a nonstatistically significant trend toward noninvasive histologic findings. No significant association was noted between detection method and site of recurrent current cancer in the breast, interval to recurrence, or patient age. There were nonstatistically significant trends toward improved relapse-free survival and overall survival for patients with recurrences detected solely with mammography. that postirradiation surveillance mammography is important for the early detection of recurrent cancer. While the trend did not reach statistical significance, detection with mammography alone had a clinically apparent impact on relapse-free and overall survival.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. W. Pinsky, M. Rebner, L. J. Pierce, M. A. Ben-David, F. Vicini, K. A. Hunt, and M. A. Helvie
Recurrent Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiation Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Mammographic Features, Method of Detection, and Stage of Recurrence
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 140 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. L. Keating, M. B. Landrum, E. Guadagnoli, E. P. Winer, and J. Z. Ayanian
Factors Related to Underuse of Surveillance Mammography Among Breast Cancer Survivors
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 24(1): 85 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. H. Shin, B.-K. Han, Y. H. Choe, S.-J. Nam, W. Park, and Y.-H. Im
Ultrasonographic Detection of Occult Cancer in Patients After Surgical Therapy for Breast Cancer
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2005; 24(5): 643 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Garbe, A. Paul, H. Kohler-Spath, U. Ellwanger, W. Stroebel, M. Schwarz, B. Schlagenhauff, F. Meier, B. Schittek, H.-J. Blaheta, et al.
Prospective Evaluation of a Follow-Up Schedule in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients: Recommendations for an Effective Follow-Up Strategy
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2003; 21(3): 520 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
D. Mintzer, J. Glassburn, B. A. Mason, and D. Sataloff
Breast Cancer in the Very Young Patient: A Multidisciplinary Case Presentation
Oncologist, December 1, 2002; 7(6): 547 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
M. Morrow, E. A. Strom, L. W. Bassett, D. D. Dershaw, B. Fowble, J. R. Harris, F. O'Malley, S. J. Schnitt, S. E. Singletary, and D. P. Winchester
Standard for the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast (DCIS)
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2002; 52(5): 256 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
L. K.F. Temple, E. E.L. Wang, and R. S. McLeod
Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 1, 1999; 161(8): 1001 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. S. Giess, D. M. Keating, M. P. Osborne, and R. Rosenblatt
Local Tumor Recurrence following Breast-Conservation Therapy: Correlation of Histopathologic Findings with Detection Method and Mammographic Findings
Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 829 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
E Grunfeld, D Mant, M P Vessey, D J Cole, and J A Stewart
Mammography after treatment for breast cancer
BMJ, September 10, 1994; 309(6955): 665b - 666.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.