Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zoarski, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lufkin, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zoarski, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lufkin, R. B.

Radiology, Vol 188, 323-327, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Head and neck: initial clinical experience with fast spin-echo MR imaging

GH Zoarski, JK Mackey, Y Anzai, WN Hanafee, PS Melki, RV Mulkern, FA Jolesz and RB Lufkin
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles.

Fast spin-echo (FSE) is a new magnetic resonance (MR) imaging pulse sequence that employs echo trains of 180 degrees radio-frequency pulses to generate multiple refocused echoes during a single repetition-time interval. Phase encoding is reordered with the lowest spatial frequency views obtained in the echoes nearest the desired effective echo time. These techniques were used to examine 30 patients with pathologic conditions of the head and neck. The images were compared with closely matched conventional T2-weighted spin-echo (SE) images obtained during the same examination. Three unblinded readers evaluated 15 sets of both images for lesion conspicuity, motion artifact, diagnostic information, number of lesions seen, image quality, and sharpness of lesion borders. In all categories, FSE images were judged better than or equal to SE images, and in most cases FSE images were obtained in one-fourth to one- half the imaging time. In no case were lesions depicted on conventional T2-weighted SE images missed on FSE images; in fact, more lesions were seen on FSE images than on conventional T2-weighted SE images.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. G. Henry, N. J. Fischbein, W. P. Dillon, D. B. Vigneron, and S. J. Nelson
High-Sensitivity Coil Array for Head and Neck Imaging: Technical Note
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2001; 22(10): 1881 - 1886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.