Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gluck, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Deutch, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gluck, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Deutch, B. M.

Radiology, Vol 188, 469-472, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Microcalcifications on postoperative mammograms as an indicator of adequacy of tumor excision

BS Gluck, DD Dershaw, L Liberman and BM Deutch
Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021.

Mammograms, including microfocus spot magnification views, were obtained before reexcision of the tumor-ectomy site in 43 women with breast carcinoma. These studies were prospectively evaluated by radiologists experienced in breast imaging. All women had mammographically evident microcalcifications associated with their original tumors. In all, tumor was at or near the margin of resection or the status of margins was unknown, necessitating reexcision of the tumorectomy site. Of 29 women with residual microcalifications, 20 had residual tumor. The positive predictive value of residual microcalcifications was 0.69. The positive predictive value was greatest (0.90) in women with ductal carcinoma in situ, when more than five microcalifications were present. Residual microcalifications not due to carcinoma were secondary to sclerosing adenosis, fat necrosis, and foreign body granuloma. Of the 13 cases in which no residual calcifications were left after tumorectomy, residual tumor was found in four. The negative predictive value of the absence of calcifications for total excision of tumor was 0.64 for all tumor types and was 1.0 for the noncomedo subtype of ductal carcinoma in situ.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
B. J. Czerniecki, G. K. Koski, U. Koldovsky, S. Xu, P. A. Cohen, R. Mick, H. Nisenbaum, T. Pasha, M. Xu, K. R. Fox, et al.
Targeting HER-2/neu in Early Breast Cancer Development Using Dendritic Cells with Staged Interleukin-12 Burst Secretion
Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 67(4): 1842 - 1852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. C. Stomper, J. Geradts, S. B. Edge, and E. G. Levine
Mammographic Predictors of the Presence and Size of Invasive Carcinomas Associated With Malignant Microcalcification Lesions Without a Mass
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1679 - 1684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, S. L. Goodstine, D. D. Dershaw, E. A. Morris, L. R. LaTrenta, A. F. Abramson, and K. J. V. Zee
One Operation After Percutaneous Diagnosis of Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Frequency and Associated Factors
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 673 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, J. Kaplan, K. J. Van Zee, E. A. Morris, L. R. LaTrenta, A. F. Abramson, and D. D. Dershaw
Bracketing Wires for Preoperative Breast Needle Localization
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2001; 177(3): 565 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. A. Frei, K. Kinkel, H. M. Bonel, Y. Lu, L. J. Esserman, and N. M. Hylton
MR Imaging of the Breast in Patients with Positive Margins After Lumpectomy: Influence of the Time Interval Between Lumpectomy and MR Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1577 - 1584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.