Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Struk, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Vellet, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Struk, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Vellet, A. D.

Radiology, Vol 189, 193-196, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Safety of outpatient peripheral angioplasty

DW Struk, RN Rankin, M Eliasziw and AD Vellet
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

PURPOSE: The safety of performing peripheral percutaneous angioplasty on an outpatient basis was studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all peripheral angioplastic procedures performed at one institution during a 4-year period. The 350 procedures in 235 patients included 84 inpatient cases, 141 outpatient cases, and 125 1-day-care cases (ie, procedures performed in patients transferred from other hospitals). RESULTS: The rates of major complications were 8.3% +/- 3.0 (mean +/- standard error) (n = 7) for inpatients. 5.0% +/- 1.8 (n = 7) for outpatients, and 5.6% +/- 2.1 (n = 7) for 1-day-care patients. Furthermore, 95% confidence intervals for the difference between complication rates were -10.3% and 3.5% for outpatient versus inpatient cases and -9.9% and 4.4% for 1-day-care versus inpatient cases. CONCLUSION: The risk of a major complication resulting from peripheral angioplasty in appropriately selected outpatients is no greater than it is for patients admitted for overnight observation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D Y HUANG, C-M ONG, H L WALTERS, C J WILKINS, D R EVANS, R D EDMONDSON, K JONES, H I RASHID, C D DEANE, D E GOSS, et al.
Day-case diagnostic and interventional peripheral angiography: 10-year experience in a radiology specialist nurse-led unit
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2008; 81(967): 537 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
N. Al-Mubarak, G. S. Roubin, J. J. Vitek, G. New, S. S. Iyer, and D. Pelz
Procedural Safety and Short-Term Outcome of Ambulatory Carotid Stenting Editorial Comment
Stroke, October 1, 2001; 32(10): 2305 - 2309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.