Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lo, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Li, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lo, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Li, J. C.

Radiology, Vol 189, 199-204, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Endolymphatic sac tumors: radiologic appearance

WW Lo, LJ Applegate, JN Carberry, LG Solti-Bohman, JW House, DE Brackmann, V Waluch and JC Li
Department of Radiology, St Vincent Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90057.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiologic appearance of endolymphatic sac tumors (ELSTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients with ELST underwent computed tomography (CT), and two of the four also underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Their radiologic studies were reviewed for characteristic findings of ELST. RESULTS: Retrolabyrinthine bone destruction was centered at the external aperture of the vestibular aqueduct in all four patients. CT showed irregular bone margins and prominent intratumoral bone in all four patients. At MR imaging, one tumor was almost homogeneous and isointense to gray matter with T1 weighting, and the other was heterogeneous and contained hyper-, hypo-, and isointense foci with T1 and T2 weighting. CONCLUSION: These radiologic changes may help distinguish ELSTs from other tumors of the temporal bone and posterior fossa.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. S. Leung, S. V. Biswas, M. Duncan, and S. Rankin
Imaging Features of von Hippel-Lindau Disease
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 65 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
Radiology Quiz Case 1--Diagnosis
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, January 1, 2003; 129(1): 131 - 132.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
F. Bonneville, J.-L. Sarrazin, K. Marsot-Dupuch, C. Iffenecker, Y.-S. Cordoliani, D. Doyon, and J.-F. Bonneville
Unusual Lesions of the Cerebellopontine Angle: A Segmental Approach
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2001; 21(2): 419 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Ayadi, Kh. B. Mahfoudh, M. Khannous, and J. Mnif
Endolymphatic Sac Tumor and von Hippel-Lindau Disease: Imaging Features
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 925 - 926.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.