Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayr, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hussey, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayr, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hussey, D. H.

Radiology, Vol 189, 601-608, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Cervical cancer: application of MR imaging in radiation therapy

NA Mayr, ET Tali, WT Yuh, BP Brown, BC Wen, RE Buller, B Anderson and DH Hussey
Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242.

PURPOSE: To evaluate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the planning of radiation therapy for patients with cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging was performed in 15 patients with predominantly advanced cervical carcinomas. Skin markings of the radiation ports were labeled with MR-detectable tubing and beads to assess the adequacy of port placement. Volume and extent of tumor at MR imaging were compared with those at physical and computed tomographic (CT) examinations. RESULTS: Tumor involvement of normal structures (parametrium, vagina, endometrium) was more extensive at MR imaging than at clinical examination in six patients (40%) and at CT in five patients (33%), resulting in modification of the radiation fields in eight patients (53%). Tumor size was larger on MR images than at clinical examination in 11 patients (73%). CONCLUSION: MR imaging can depict tumor volume and better delineate the extent of involvement than physical and CT examination. This can be useful for placement of radiation ports, especially when small boost fields are used.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. A. Mayr, W. T. C. Yuh, T. Taoka, J. Z. Wang, D. H. Wu, J. F. Montebello, S. L. Meeks, A. C. Paulino, V. A. Magnotta, M. Adli, et al.
Serial therapy-induced changes in tumor shape in cervical cancer and their impact on assessing tumor volume and treatment response.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 65 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
V. Nicolet, L. Carignan, F. Bourdon, and O. Prosmanne
MR Imaging of Cervical Carcinoma: A Practical Staging Approach
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2000; 20(6): 1539 - 1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.