Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Szumowski, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quinn, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Szumowski, J.

Radiology, Vol 190, 323-327, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: correlation with whole-mount specimens

SF Quinn, DA Franzini, TA Demlow, DR Rosencrantz, J Kim, RM Hanna and J Szumowski
Department of Radiology, Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, OR 97210.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in staging prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors prospectively evaluated MR images obtained with an endorectal surface coil from 70 consecutive patients with known prostate cancer. Gadopentetate dimeglumine was administered to 40 patients. Multiple sequences were used, including conventional and fast spin echo, with and without fat suppression. The readers were blinded to the MR findings unless bone or nodal metastasis was present. MR images were compared with whole-mount sections. RESULTS: The prospective staging accuracy for MR imaging was 51% (36 of 70 patients). Stage B disease was present in 27 patients (38%), stage C in 42 (60%), and stage D in one (1%). The retrospective staging accuracy was 67% (47 of 70 patients). Of the 42 patients with stage C disease, positive surgical margins were present in 36 (85%). Gadopentetate dimeglumine did not help detect or stage tumors. CONCLUSION: Further studies must be performed to determine the role of endorectal coil MR imaging in the staging of prostate cancer.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. N. Bloch, E. Furman-Haran, T. H. Helbich, R. E. Lenkinski, H. Degani, C. Kratzik, M. Susani, A. Haitel, S. Jaromi, L. Ngo, et al.
Prostate Cancer: Accurate Determination of Extracapsular Extension with High-Spatial-Resolution Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR Imaging Initial Results
Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 176 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. J. Choi, J. K. Kim, N. Kim, K. W. Kim, E. K. Choi, and K.-S. Cho
Functional MR Imaging of Prostate Cancer
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2007; 27(1): 63 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. Beyersdorff, K. Taymoorian, T. Knosel, D. Schnorr, R. Felix, B. Hamm, and H. Bruhn
MRI of Prostate Cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Comparison of Image Quality in Tumor Detection and Staging
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1214 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. L. Buckley, C. Roberts, G. J. M. Parker, J. P. Logue, and C. E. Hutchinson
Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Vascular Characteristics with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging--Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 709 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Qayyum, F. V. Coakley, Y. Lu, J. D. Olpin, L. Wu, B. M. Yeh, P. R. Carroll, and J. Kurhanewicz
Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Effect of Prior Transrectal Biopsy on Endorectal MRI and MR Spectroscopic Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1079 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. R. Engelbrecht, H. J. Huisman, R. J. F. Laheij, G. J. Jager, G. J. L. H. van Leenders, C. A. Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa, J. J. M. C. H. de la Rosette, J. G. Blickman, and J. O. Barentsz
Discrimination of Prostate Cancer from Normal Peripheral Zone and Central Gland Tissue by Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 248 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Cornud, T. Flam, L. Chauveinc, K. Hamida, Y. Chretien, A. Vieillefond, O. Helenon, and J. F. Moreau
Extraprostatic Spread of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Factors Predictive of pT3 Tumor and of Positive Endorectal MR Imaging Examination Results
Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 203 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Cornud, K. Hamida, T. Flam, O. Helenon, Y. Chretien, N. Thiounn, J. M. Correas, J. M. Casanova, and J. F. Moreau
Endorectal Color Doppler Sonography and Endorectal MR Imaging Features of Nonpalpable Prostate Cancer: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1161 - 1168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. K. Yu, J. Scheidler, H. Hricak, D. B. Vigneron, C. J. Zaloudek, R. G. Males, S. J. Nelson, P. R. Carroll, and J. Kurhanewicz
Prostate Cancer: Prediction of Extracapsular Extension with Endorectal MR Imaging and Three-dimensional Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 481 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Gossmann, Y. Okuhata, D. M. Shames, T. H. Helbich, T. P. L. Roberts, M. F. Wendland, S. Huber, and R. C. Brasch
Prostate Cancer Tumor Grade Differentiation with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging in the Rat: Comparison of Macromolecular and Small-Molecular Contrast Media-Preliminary Experience
Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 265 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.