Radiology, Vol 190, 499-508, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Pulmonary embolism: comparison of MR images with radionuclide and angiographic studies

WA Erdman, RM Peshock, HC Redman, F Bonte, M Meyerson, HT Jayson, GL Miller, GD Clarke and RW Parkey
Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-9071.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy and potential of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluation of patients in whom pulmonary embolism is suspected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blinded, prospective interpretations of multiphasic, cardiac-gated spin-echo MR images were compared with retrospective chart review in 86 patients in whom pulmonary embolism was suspected. In 64 patients, the presence or absence of pulmonary emboli was established with x-ray angiography (n = 34) or ventilation- perfusion (V-P) scans and concurrent clinical impression (n = 30). RESULTS: In the subgroup with angiographic proof, MR imaging had a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 77%, positive predictive value of 86%, and negative predictive value of 83%. In 21 patients with intermediate probability of pulmonary embolism on V-P scans and angiograms, MR images enabled diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in 12 of 12 patients (sensitivity, 100%) and absence of pulmonary embolism in seven of nine patients (specificity, 78%). CONCLUSION: MR imaging reliably depicts large and medium-size pulmonary emboli, regardless of infiltrates or effusion; hence, it may clarify findings on V-P scans that show intermediate probability of pulmonary embolism or are at variance with the clinical impression.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. D. Stein, P. K. Woodard, R. D. Hull, F. Kayali, J. G. Weg, R. E. Olson, and S. E. Fowler Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Detection of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: An In-depth Review Chest, December 1, 2003; 124(6): 2324 - 2328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Han, K. S. Lee, T. Franquet, N. L. Muller, T. S. Kim, H. Kim, O J. Kwon, and H. S. Byun Thrombotic and Nonthrombotic Pulmonary Arterial Embolism: Spectrum of Imaging Findings RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1521 - 1539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Gaba, R. C. Carlos, W. J. Weadock, G. P. Reddy, M. B. Sneider, and P. N. Cascade Cardiovascular MR Imaging: Technique Optimization and Detection of Disease in Clinical Practice RadioGraphics, November 1, 2002; 22(6): e6 - e6. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. E. Wood Major Pulmonary Embolism : Review of a Pathophysiologic Approach to the Golden Hour of Hemodynamically Significant Pulmonary Embolism Chest, March 1, 2002; 121(3): 877 - 905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. P. Smith Pulmonary Embolism: What's Wrong with This Diagnosis? Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1489 - 1497. [Full Text]

				V. Tapson The Diagnostic Approach to Acute Venous Thromboembolism . Clinical Practice Guideline Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1999; 160(3): 1043 - 1066. [Full Text]

				E. K. Yucel Pulmonary MR Angiography: Is It Ready Now? Radiology, February 1, 1999; 210(2): 301 - 303. [Full Text]

				V. H. D. Bruyn, S. R. Bergmann, B. A. Keyt, and B. E. Sobel Visualization of Thrombi in Pulmonary Arteries With Radiolabeled, Enzymatically Inactivated Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Circulation, September 1, 1995; 92(5): 1320 - 1325. [Abstract] [Full Text]