Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Sanders, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Sanders, P. C.

Radiology, Vol 190, 525-528, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Scanning slit chest radiography: a practical and efficient scatter control design

GT Barnes, X Wu and PC Sanders
Department of Radiology, University of Alabama Hospitals and Clinics, Birmingham.

PURPOSE: To design a chest radiography unit that eliminates scatter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scanning slit radiography unit that also incorporates a conventional grid was designed. The scanning slit geometry defined a 10-mm-wide beam at the image receptor. RESULTS: With a typical heavy-duty radiographic tube, the proposed system was capable of delivering an entrance skin exposure of up to 32 microC/kg for a 1- second scan. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the scatter-to- primary ratio (S/P) imaged with the scanning slit system alone was 0.125 for a 35 x 43-cm, 23-cm-thick Lucite phantom imaged at 140 kVp. When the system was coupled with 4:1, 8:1, and 12:1 grids, S/P decreased to 0.063, 0.055, and 0.054, respectively. CONCLUSION: A scanning slit system coupled with a conventional grid is a practical and highly efficient method of controlling scatter and will result in minimal soft-tissue and bone measurement errors in dual-energy chest radiography.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.