Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilsanz, V.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gilsanz, V.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, W. G.

Radiology, Vol 190, 678-682, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Gender differences in vertebral sizes in adults: biomechanical implications

V Gilsanz, MI Boechat, R Gilsanz, ML Loro, TF Roe and WG Goodman
Department of Radiology, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, CA 90027.

PURPOSE: To determine if vertebral bone densities or vertebral body sizes contribute to gender differences in vertebral bone mass in adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cancellous and cortical bone densities and dimensions of three lumbar vertebrae in 25 women and 18 men were measured with quantitative computed tomography (CT) and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Neither cancellous nor cortical vertebral bone densities differed in healthy adults. Vertebral bodies in women had lower cross-sectional areas (8.22 cm2 +/- 1.09 [standard deviation] versus 10.98 cm2 +/- 1.25, P < .001) and volumes (22.42 cm3 +/- 2.40 versus 30.86 cm3 +/- 2.6, P < .001). These differences also were evident in men and women matched for age, weight, vertebral bone density, and vertebral body height. Overall cross-sectional areas of vertebral bodies are 25% smaller in women than men. Vertebral bone densities do not differ between sexes. Estimates of mechanical stress within vertebral bodies are 30%-40% higher in women than men for equivalent applied loads. CONCLUSION: Smaller vertebral bodies in women confer biomechanical disadvantages that may contribute to more vertebral fractures in elderly women.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. S. Bauer, T. D. Henning, D. Mueller, Y. Lu, S. Majumdar, and T. M. Link
Volumetric Quantitative CT of the Spine and Hip Derived from Contrast-Enhanced MDCT: Conversion Factors
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1294 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. R. Center, T. V. Nguyen, N. A. Pocock, and J. A. Eisman
Volumetric Bone Density at the Femoral Neck as a Common Measure of Hip Fracture Risk for Men and Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 2776 - 2782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
Q.-Y. Huang, F.-H. Xu, H. Shen, H.-Y. Deng, T. Conway, Y.-J. Liu, Y.-Z. Liu, J.-L. Li, M.-X. Li, K. M. Davies, et al.
Genome scan for QTLs underlying bone size variation at 10 refined skeletal sites: genetic heterogeneity and the significance of phenotype refinement
Physiol Genomics, May 19, 2004; 17(3): 326 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
X-P Wu, E-Y Liao, R-C Dai, X-H Luo, and H Zhang
Effects of projective bone area size of the spine on bone density and the diagnosis of osteoporosis in healthy pre-menopausal women in China
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2003; 76(907): 452 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
J. P. Brown and R. G. Josse
Lignes directrices de pratique clinique 2002 pour le diagnostic et le traitement de l'osteoporose au Canada
Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 18, 2003; 168(90060): SF1 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
J. P. Brown and R. G. Josse
2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada
Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 12, 2002; 167(90100): s1 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Arfai, P. D. Pitukcheewanont, M. I. Goran, C. J. Tavare, L. Heller, and V. Gilsanz
Bone, Muscle, and Fat: Sex-related Differences in Prepubertal Children
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 338 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
I. M M Gemmell
Injuries among female army recruits: a conflict of legislation
J R Soc Med, January 1, 2002; 95(1): 23 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Luiza Loro, J. Sayre, T. F. Roe, M. I. Goran, F. R. Kaufman, and V. Gilsanz
Early Identification of Children Predisposed to Low Peak Bone Mass and Osteoporosis Later in Life
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2000; 85(10): 3908 - 3918.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
J M Kaufman, O Johnell, E Abadie, S Adami, M Audran, B Avouac, W B. Sedrine, G Calvo, J P Devogelaer, V Fuchs, et al.
Background for studies on the treatment of male osteoporosis: state of the art
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2000; 59(10): 765 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Gilsanz, A. Kovanlikaya, G. Costin, T. F. Roe, J. Sayre, and F. Kaufman
Differential Effect of Gender on the Sizes of the Bones in the Axial and Appendicular Skeletons
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 1997; 82(5): 1603 - 1607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
C. Cooper, C. Fall, P. Egger, R. Hobbs, R. Eastell, and D. Barker
Growth in infancy and bone mass in later life
Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 1997; 56(1): 17 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.