Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamel, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Guire, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamel, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Guire, K. E.

Radiology, Vol 190, 683-687, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Radiation dose reduction in CT of the pediatric pelvis

IR Kamel, RJ Hernandez, JE Martin, AE Schlesinger, LT Niklason and KE Guire
Department of Radiological Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a lower radiation dose technique can be used for computed tomography (CT) of the pediatric pelvis without significant loss of diagnostic image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six pediatric patients underwent CT at 80 mAs (experimental group), and 42 underwent CT at 240 mAs (control group). Anatomic details, image quality, and the degree of confidence in reaching a diagnosis were graded on a scale of 1 (poor) to 4 (excellent). RESULTS: The difference in perceived image quality between the experimental and control groups was not statistically significant. The mean scores for scans evaluated by the first reader were 3.88 for the experimental group and 3.92 for the control group (P = .2804). The mean scores for the second reader were 3.78 and 3.77 for the experimental and control groups, respectively (P = .8131). CONCLUSION: A substantial dose reduction can be achieved if pelvic CT is performed at 80 mAs, without a recognizable deterioration of diagnostic image quality.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Herzog, D. M. Mulvihill, S. A. Nguyen, G. Savino, B. Schmidt, P. Costello, T. J. Vogl, and U. J. Schoepf
Pediatric Cardiovascular CT Angiography: Radiation Dose Reduction Using Automatic Anatomic Tube Current Modulation
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1232 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. R. Fefferman, E. Bomsztyk, A. M. Yim, R. Rivera, J. B. Amodio, L. P. Pinkney, N. A. Strubel, M. E. Noz, and H. Rusinek
Appendicitis in Children: Low-Dose CT with a Phantom-based Simulation Technique--Initial Observations
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 641 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. J. Siegel, B. Schmidt, D. Bradley, C. Suess, and C. Hildebolt
Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Pediatric CT: Effect of Technical Factors and Phantom Size and Shape
Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 515 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, T. L. Toth, L. M. Hamberg, M. A. Blake, J.-A. Shepard, and S. Saini
Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization
Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 619 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J Pages, N Buls, and M Osteaux
CT doses in children: a multicentre study
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2003; 76(911): 803 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. P. Heneghan, K. A. McGuire, R. A. Leder, D. M. DeLong, T. Yoshizumi, and R. C. Nelson
Helical CT for Nephrolithiasis and Ureterolithiasis: Comparison of Conventional and Reduced Radiation-Dose Techniques
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 575 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Boone, E. M. Geraghty, J. A. Seibert, and S. L. Wootton-Gorges
Dose Reduction in Pediatric CT: A Rational Approach
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 352 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. L. Fricke, L. F. Donnelly, D. P. Frush, T. Yoshizumi, V. Varchena, S. A. Poe, and J. Lucaya
In-Plane Bismuth Breast Shields for Pediatric CT: Effects on Radiation Dose and Image Quality Using Experimental and Clinical Data
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 407 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. F. McNitt-Gray
AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT: Radiation Dose in CT
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2002; 22(6): 1541 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. P. Frush, B. Soden, K. S. Frush, and C. Lowry
Improved Pediatric Multidetector Body CT Using a Size-Based Color-Coded Format
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 721 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. J. Brenner, C. D. Elliston, E. J. Hall, and W. E. Berdon
Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 289 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Paterson, D. P. Frush, and L. F. Donnelly
Helical CT of the Body: Are Settings Adjusted for Pediatric Patients?
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 297 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. F. Donnelly, K. H. Emery, A. S. Brody, T. Laor, V. M. Gylys-Morin, C. G. Anton, S. R. Thomas, and D. P. Frush
Minimizing Radiation Dose for Pediatric Body Applications of Single-Detector Helical CT: Strategies at a Large Children's Hospital
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 303 - 306.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Huda, E. M. Scalzetti, and G. Levin
Technique Factors and Image Quality as Functions of Patient Weight at Abdominal CT
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 430 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.