Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mungovan, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vacarro, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mungovan, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vacarro, J.

Radiology, Vol 191, 111-113, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Hepatic cavernous hemangiomas: lack of enlargement over time

JA Mungovan, JJ Cronan and J Vacarro
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence 02903.

PURPOSE: To determine whether change in size is a characteristic of cavernous hemangioma of the liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one focal masses in 21 patients were diagnosed as cavernous hemangiomas with imaging-guided percutaneous fine-needle biopsy performed between 2 weeks and 2 months after initial imaging study (computed tomography [CT] or ultrasonography [US]). Follow-up imaging examinations (CT, US, or magnetic resonance imaging plus US) were obtained at 5-84 months in all patients. RESULTS: The cavernous hemangiomas ranged in size from 1.5 to 13.5 cm. At follow-up imaging, 19 (90%) of 21 lesions had not changed in size; the two remaining lesions increased by 1 and 2 cm over 3 and 10 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The size of the majority of cavernous hemangiomas remains stable for periods of follow-up ranging from 5 to 84 months. Growth of these lesions is not characteristic and, when it occurs, should prompt reassessment of the diagnosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Caturelli, M. Pompili, F. Bartolucci, D. A. Siena, M. Sperandeo, A. Andriulli, and M. Bisceglia
Hemangioma-like Lesions in Chronic Liver Disease: Diagnostic Evaluation in Patients
Radiology, August 1, 2001; 220(2): 337 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Brancatelli, M. P. Federle, A. Blachar, and L. Grazioli
Hemangioma in the Cirrhotic Liver: Diagnosis and Natural History
Radiology, April 1, 2001; 219(1): 69 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. M. Leifer, W. D. Middleton, S. A. Teefey, C. O. Menias, and J. R. Leahy
Follow-up of Patients at Low Risk for Hepatic Malignancy with a Characteristic Hemangioma at US1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 167 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.