Radiology, Vol 191, 149-153, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Peripheral vascular disease: evaluation with stepping DSA and conventional screen-film angiography

ES Malden, D Picus, TM Vesely, MD Darcy and ME Hicks
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate stepping digital subtraction angiography (S-DSA), which enables peripheral digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of both lower extremities after one injection of contrast material, in comparison with conventional screen-film angiography (SFA) for evaluation of lower-extremity vascular disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients were prospectively examined. Each study was performed without knowledge of the findings in the other. Additional stationary DSA images were obtained whenever necessary. All studies were individually evaluated for diagnostic adequacy and then side by side for vascular opacification, timing of contrast enhancement, ease of reading, and overall superiority. RESULTS: The diagnostic adequacy of S-DSA was not statistically different from that of SFA (P > .30). SFA was subjectively considered superior in opacification (P < .003), ease of reading (P < .003), and subjective overall superiority (P < .005). S-DSA was superior in timing of contrast enhancement (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The advantages of S-DSA can be achieved while the diagnostic adequacy of SFA is maintained. However, SFA was considered superior in three of four subjective characteristics.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Fenchel, A. M. Scheule, N. I. Stauder, U. Kramer, K. Tomaschko, T. Nagele, C. Bretschneider, H.-P. Schlemmer, C. D. Claussen, and S. Miller Atherosclerotic Disease: Whole-Body Cardiovascular Imaging with MR System with 32 Receiver Channels and Total-Body Surface Coil Technology--Initial Clinical Results Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 280 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Ouwendijk, M. C. J. M. Kock, K. Visser, P. M. T. Pattynama, M. W. de Haan, and M. G. M. Hunink Interobserver Agreement for the Interpretation of Contrast-Enhanced 3D MR Angiography and MDCT Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Disease Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1261 - 1267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Ouwendijk, M. de Vries, P. M. T. Pattynama, M. R. H. M. van Sambeek, M. W. de Haan, T. Stijnen, J. M. A. van Engelshoven, and M. G. M. Hunink Imaging Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography and Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 1094 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. M. Meaney, J. P. Ridgway, S. Chakraverty, I. Robertson, D. Kessel, A. Radjenovic, M. Kouwenhoven, A. Kassner, and M. A. Smith Stepping-Table Gadolinium- enhanced Digital Subtraction MR Angiography of the Aorta and Lower Extremity Arteries: Preliminary Experience Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 59 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text]