Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hausegger, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zenker, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hausegger, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zenker, G.

Radiology, Vol 191, 177-181, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: angiographic follow-up and secondary interventions

KA Hausegger, HM Sternthal, GE Klein, R Karaic, R Stauber and G Zenker
Department of Radiology, Karl-Franzens University of Graz, Austria.

PURPOSE: To evaluate transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placements and secondary interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty shunt venograms were obtained in 21 patients with TIPS placement at 6-month intervals or if Doppler ultrasound showed an abnormality. RESULTS: Abnormalities in the shunt were shown in 24 venograms (80%). Eight occlusions (two early, five late, one repeat) and 16 stenoses (nine hepatic vein, six hepatic vein and stent, one stent only) were seen. Two patients with shunt abnormalities experienced recurrent bleeding. All others had no signs of recurrent portal hypertension. Occluded TIPS were recanalized (n = 5) or a new TIPS was placed parallel to the occluded one (n = 2). One repeat occlusion was not revised. Fifteen of 16 stenoses were treated successfully with balloon catheter dilation (n = 8) or additional stent placement (n = 7). The mean portal pressure gradient before revision was 21 mm Hg +/- 3.8 (standard deviation) and 13 mm Hg +/- 3.6 after revision. CONCLUSION: Stenosis and occlusion of TIPS may be common during long-term follow- up. Regular examinations may demonstrate abnormalities early. An abnormality seen on the shunt venogram usually can be revised during the same procedure.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
A S Shaw, S M Ryan, R C Beese, S Norris, M Bowles, M Rela, and P S Sidhu
Liver transplantation
Imaging, August 1, 2002; 14(4): 314 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Zizka, P. Elias, A. Krajina, A. Michl, M. Lojik, P. Ryska, J. Maskova, P. Hulek, V. Safka, T. Vanasek, et al.
Value of Doppler Sonography in Revealing Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Malfunction: A 5-Year Experience in 216 Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2000; 175(1): 141 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Chopra, G. D. Dodd III, K. N. Chintapalli, H. Rhim, C. E. Encarnacion, J. C. Palmaz, C. C. Esola, and A. A. Ghiatas
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: Accuracy of Helical CT Angiography in the Detection of Shunt Abnormalities
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 115 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.