Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steinkamp, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Felix, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steinkamp, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Felix, R.

Radiology, Vol 191, 795-798, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Enlarged cervical lymph nodes at helical CT

HJ Steinkamp, N Hosten, C Richter, H Schedel and R Felix
Department of Radiology, Freie Universitat Berlin, Klinikum Rudolf Virchow/Standort Wedding, Germany.

PURPOSE: To evaluate criteria for differentiating malignant versus reactive lymph nodes in the head and neck on the basis of findings at helical computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Helical CT scans were evaluated of 70 consecutive patients (46 men and 24 women, aged 20-78 years [mean, 51 years]) with known head and neck tumors and cervical lymph node enlargement. The ratio of the maximal longitudinal to the maximal axial diameter (L/T) was calculated for nodes larger than 8 mm in diameter based on measurements obtained from coronal, paraxial, and sagittal reconstructions. RESULTS: At histologic examination, 96 of 164 nodes were malignant. Of these, 94 of 96 nodes had an L/T of less than 2 (sensitivity, 97%; specificity, 97%; accuracy, 97% for malignancy). Minimal diameter was more than 8 mm in 83 of 96 nodes (sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 89%; accuracy, 88% for malignancy). Low-attenuation centers and rim enhancement were seen in 75 of 96 nodes (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 100%; accuracy, 86% for malignancy). CONCLUSION: The L/T at helical CT provide an accurate assessment of reactive versus malignant nodes in the head and neck.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Memarsadeghi, C. C. Riedl, A. Kaneider, A. Galid, M. Rudas, W. Matzek, and T. H. Helbich
Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Breast Carcinomas: Assessment with Nonenhanced versus USPIO-enhanced MR Imaging.
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 367 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
Y Morimoto, H Kurokawa, T Tanaka, Y Yamashita, S Kito, S Okabe, T Takahashi, and T Ohba
Correlation between the incidence of central nodal necrosis in cervical lymph node metastasis and the extent of differentiation in oral squamous cell carcinoma
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2006; 35(1): 18 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Eida, M. Sumi, K. Yonetsu, Y. Kimura, and T. Nakamura
Combination of Helical CT and Doppler Sonography in the Follow-up of Patients with Clinical N0 Stage Neck Disease and Oral Cancer
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2003; 24(3): 312 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Keberle, A. Tschammler, and D. Hahn
Single-Bolus Technique for Spiral CT of Laryngopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparison of Different Contrast Material Volumes, Flow Rates, and Start Delays
Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 171 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Groell, O. Doerfler, G. J. Schaffler, and W. Habermann
Contrast-Enhanced Helical CT of the Head and Neck: Improved Conspicuity of Squamous Cell Carcinoma on Delayed Scans
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2001; 176(6): 1571 - 1575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
K. Yonetsu, M. Sumi, M. Izumi, M. Ohki, S. Eida, and T. Nakamura
Contribution of Doppler Sonography Blood Flow Information to the Diagnosis of Metastatic Cervical Nodes in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Assessment in Relation to Anatomic Levels of the Neck
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2001; 22(1): 163 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. T. Yang, W. W. M. Lam, M. Y. Yu, T. H. Cheung, and C. Metreweli
Comparison of Dynamic Helical CT and Dynamic MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Cervical Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 759 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. Murakami, M. Furusawa, Y. Baba, R. Nishimura, F. Katsura, M. Eura, K. Masuyama, and M. Takahashi
Dynamic Helical CT of T1 and T2 Glottic Carcinomas: Predictive Value for Local Control with Radiation Therapy
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., July 1, 2000; 21(7): 1320 - 1326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. D. Moritz, A. Ludwig, and J.-W. Oestmann
Contrast-Enhanced Color Doppler Sonography for Evaluation of Enlarged Cervical Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1279 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. D. Cheson, S. J. Horning, B. Coiffier, M. A. Shipp, R. I. Fisher, J. M. Connors, T. A. Lister, J. Vose, A. Grillo-Lopez, A. Hagenbeek, et al.
Report of an International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 1999; 17(4): 1244 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. G. Mack, J. O. Balzer, R. Straub, K. Eichler, and T. J. Vogl
Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced MR Imaging of Head and Neck Lymph Nodes
Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 239 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.