Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glaze, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bushong, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glaze, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bushong, S. C.

Radiology, Vol 191, 849-852, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Exposure rates during special procedures with C-arm type fluoroscopic systems

S Glaze, LK Wagner, BR Archer and SC Bushong
Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030.

PURPOSE: To test for regulatory compliance of free-in-air entrance air kerma rates (EAKR) in C-arm type fluoroscopic equipment, measurements are frequently made under minimum source-to-image receptor distance (SID) and at 300 mm from the image intensifier. However, this is not representative of normal patient geometry, and the automatic brightness controls on these units frequently increase tube output as SID increases. This study investigated effects of these circumstances on actual EAKRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Typical patient geometries were observed and recorded for 23 consecutive body vascular procedures. EAKRs were measured under compliance and normal patient geometries with use of five modern C-arm type systems for special procedures. RESULTS: SIDs of 1 m were typical when rapid film changers were employed and the patient's entrance skin surface was typically 500 mm from the image receptor. Actual EAKRs were found to be up to 2.5 times those measured under compliance geometry. CONCLUSION: Actual patient geometries should be used to ensure correct estimates of EAKRs.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.