Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by McCarthy, S.

Radiology, Vol 192, 55-60, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Female pelvis: impact of MR imaging on treatment decisions and net cost analysis

LB Schwartz, E Panageas, R Lange, J Rizzo, F Comite and S McCarthy
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of gynecologic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on treatment decisions and net cost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine consecutive women were referred for 70 pelvic MR imaging examinations. Diagnosis and treatment plans were obtained from referring physicians before and immediately after they were given verbal reports of MR imaging results. Outcome regarding treatment and symptoms was obtained at a mean follow-up of 10.9 months. RESULTS: Of 49 (71%) patients originally recommended for surgery, 36 (73%) either did not undergo surgery or less invasive surgery was performed. In 58 (84%) patients, the treatment performed was that recommended after performance of MR imaging. Symptoms resolved in 57 (83%) patients. Use of MR imaging resulted in an overall savings of $63 per patient ($1,736 per patient originally recommended for surgery). CONCLUSION: Use of pelvic MR imaging in diagnosis of some gynecologic diseases may alter treatment, decrease the number of invasive surgical procedures performed, and reduce total health care expenditures.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. Y. Jeong, H. K. Kang, T. W. Chung, J. J. Seo, and J. G. Park
Uterine Cervical Carcinoma after Therapy: CT and MR Imaging Findings
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 969 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. R. Margulis and J. H. Sunshine
Radiology at the Turn of the Millennium1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 15 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Hricak, M. Chen, F. V. Coakley, K. Kinkel, K. K. Yu, G. Sica, P. Bacchetti, and C. B. Powell
Complex Adnexal Masses: Detection and Characterization with MR Imaging-Multivariate Analysis1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 39 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. Murase, E. S. Siegelman, E. K. Outwater, L. A. Perez-Jaffe, and R. W. Tureck
Uterine Leiomyomas: Histopathologic Features, MR Imaging Findings, Differential Diagnosis, and Treatment
RadioGraphics, September 1, 1999; 19(5): 1179 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. S. Siegelman and E. K. Outwater
Tissue Characterization in the Female Pelvis by Means of MR Imaging
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 5 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. G. Ali, F. V. Coakley, H. Hricak, and P. N. Bretan
Complex Posttransplantation Abnormalities of Renal Allografts: Evaluation with MR Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 95 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. A. Tukeva, H. J. Aronen, P. T. Karjalainen, P. Molander, T. Paavonen, and J. Paavonen
MR Imaging in Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Comparison with Laparoscopy and US
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 209 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.