Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brady, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brady, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, I.

Radiology, Vol 192, 373-378, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Colorectal cancer overlooked at barium enema examination and colonoscopy: a continuing perceptual problem

AP Brady, GW Stevenson and I Stevenson
Department of Radiology, Wellesley Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

PURPOSE: To evaluate reasons for missed diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma at barium enema (BE) examination and colonoscopy and determine if standards have improved since a similar study in 1981. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant studies obtained within 3 years of diagnosis in 161 patients with colorectal carcinoma treated in 1990 were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-seven carcinomas were overlooked at BE examination and seven at colonoscopy. Fifteen percent of BE examination errors were purely perceptive (ie, the tumor was visible in retrospect). Another 15% were purely technical. Combined perceptive and technical errors occurred in 45% of cases. Interpretive errors (ie, the lesion was misinterpreted as benign) occurred in 25% of cases. CONCLUSION: Similar reasons for missing diagnoses of colorectal cancer at BE examination were seen in 1990 and 1981, with a high rate of perceptive errors. Double reading BE studies may reduce this rate, and readiness to perform BE examination after an incomplete colonoscopy may reduce colonoscopic "misses."


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
H. Singh, S. Sethi, M. Raber, and L. A. Petersen
Errors in Cancer Diagnosis: Current Understanding and Future Directions
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 25(31): 5009 - 5018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
Accuracy of Diagnostic Procedures: Has It Improved Over the Past Five Decades?
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1173 - 1178.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
A SLATER
Alteration in bowel habit
Imaging, December 1, 2006; 18(4): 208 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. M. Thompson, W. L. Foster, E. K. Paulson, D. Niedzwiecki, V. H. S. Low, L. B. Fulford, B. W. Broomer, L. Sanders, and D. C. Rockey
Causes of Errors in Polyp Detection at Air-Contrast Barium Enema Examination
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 139 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. B. Kopans
Mammography Screening Is Saving Thousands of Lives, but Will It Survive Medical Malpractice?
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 20 - 24.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. L. Canon, J. K. Smith, D. E. Morgan, B. C. Jones, S. C. Fell, P. J. Kenney, D. Ferrante, M. E. Lockhart, A. O. Westfall, and R. E. Koehler
Double Reading of Barium Enemas: Is It Necessary?
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1607 - 1610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. Yee
CT Screening for Colorectal Cancer
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2002; 22(6): 1525 - 1531.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. Pignone, M. Rich, S. M. Teutsch, A. O. Berg, and K. N. Lohr
Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults at Average Risk: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, July 16, 2002; 137(2): 132 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Yee, G. A. Akerkar, R. K. Hung, A. M. Steinauer-Gebauer, S. D. Wall, and K. R. McQuaid
Colorectal Neoplasia: Performance Characteristics of CT Colonography for Detection in 300 Patients
Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 685 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. S. Levine, S. E. Rubesin, I. Laufer, and H. Herlinger
Diagnosis of Colorectal Neoplasms at Double-Contrast Barium Enema Examination
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 11 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Glick
Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Review of the Issues and a Comparison with Other Screening Alternatives
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2000; 174(6): 1529 - 1537.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. W. Stevenson
1998 RSNA Annual Oration in Diagnostic Radiology : Colorectal Cancer Imaging: A Challenge for Radiologists
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 615 - 621.
[Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. M. Fenlon, D. P. Nunes, P. C. Schroy, M. A. Barish, P. D. Clarke, and J. T. Ferrucci
A Comparison of Virtual and Conventional Colonoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps
N. Engl. J. Med., November 11, 1999; 341(20): 1496 - 1503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. D. Tourassi
Journey toward Computer-aided Diagnosis: Role of Image Texture Analysis
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 317 - 320.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Strøm and J. L. Larsen
Colon Cancer at Barium Enema Examination and Colonoscopy: A Study from the County of Hordaland, Norway
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 211 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.