Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kawamoto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kawamoto, K.
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, K.

Radiology, Vol 192, 697-702, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Colonic submucosal tumors: comparison of endoscopic US and target air- enema CT with barium enema study and colonoscopy

K Kawamoto, T Ueyama, I Iwashita, T Utsunomiya, H Honda, H Onitsuka, Y Haraguchi, N Kojima, H Takano and K Masuda
Department of Radiology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

PURPOSE: To compare the imaging characteristics of colonic submucosal tumors at endoscopic ultrasound (US) and target air-enema computed tomography (TACT) with those at conventional double-contrast barium enema study and colonoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with suspected colonic submucosal tumors at barium enema study and colonoscopy underwent endoscopic US, TACT, or both. Morphologic features and posture-related change in shape of tumor were evaluated with barium enema study, color and consistency of tumor with colonoscopy, internal echogenicity of tumor and layer of origin in normal colonic wall with endoscopic US, and CT attenuation number with TACT. RESULTS: Eight lipomas, seven carcinoids, three leiomyomas, four lymphangiomas, and one hemangioma were found at histologic examination. Lipomas and lymphangiomas had characteristic findings at endoscopic US and TACT. The differential diagnosis of the other submucosal tumors was facilitated by using endoscopic US. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic US and TACT may play a valuable role in the evaluation of colonic submucosal tumors.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Ajaj, T. C. Lauenstein, G. Pelster, G. Holtmann, S. G. Ruehm, J. F. Debatin, and S. C. Goehde
MR Colonography in Patients with Incomplete Conventional Colonoscopy
Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 452 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
S. D. St. Peter, M. A. Abbas, and K. A. Kelly
The Spectrum of Pneumatosis Intestinalis
Arch Surg, January 1, 2003; 138(1): 68 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.