Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Saloner, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Saloner, D.

Radiology, Vol 193, 219-226, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis from source MR angiograms

CM Anderson, RE Lee, DL Levin, S de la Torre Alonso and D Saloner
Section of Radiology (114D), Veteran Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94121.

PURPOSE: To determine whether interpretation of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis from source partitions is more accurate than interpretation from maximum-intensity projections (MIPs) from three- dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The percentage of diameter ICA stenosis was measured on source images and MIPs from sagittal (n = 150) and transverse (n = 140) 3D TOF MR angiography. Measurements were compared with those from conventional angiography. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing 70%-99% stenosis were 96% and 78%, respectively, for sagittal MIPs, 88% and 90% for sagittal source images, 92% and 86% for transverse MIPs, and 92% and 95% for transverse source images. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves statistically significantly increased (P < .05) with interpretation from source images. Complete loss of intravascular signal was not encountered on source partitions except within a greater than 85% stenosis. CONCLUSION: Interpretation of source partitions rather than MIPs reduces the tendency for overestimation of stenosis with MR angiography and improves the specificity for discriminating 70%-99% stenosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. Saloner, G. Acevedo-Bolton, M. Wintermark, and J. H. Rapp
MRI of Geometric and Compositional Features of Vulnerable Carotid Plaque
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 637 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
C. H. Wierks and N. Labropoulos
Noninvasive Carotid Imaging
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 89 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. J. Nederkoorn, O. E. H. Elgersma, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelboom, L. J. Kappelle, and W. P. T. M. Mali
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography for Diagnosis
Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 677 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. J. Nederkoorn, Y. van der Graaf, and M.G. M. Hunink
Duplex Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review
Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1324 - 1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S G Patel, D A Collie, J M Wardlaw, S C Lewis, A R Wright, R J Gibson, and R J Sellar
Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2002; 73(1): 21 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J M Wardlaw, S C Lewis, P Humphrey, G Young, D Collie, and C P Warlow
How does the degree of carotid stenosis affect the accuracy and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography?
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2001; 71(2): 155 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. C.C. Johnston and L. B. Goldstein
Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: Noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography
Neurology, April 24, 2001; 56(8): 1009 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
T. J. Tegos, E. Kalodiki, M. M. Sabetai, and A. N. Nicolaides
Stroke: Pathogenesis, Investigations, and Prognosis: Part II of III
Angiology, November 1, 2000; 51(11): 885 - 894.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
W. M. Adams, R. D. Laitt, and A. Jackson
The Role of MR Angiography in the Pretreatment Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparative Study
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2000; 21(9): 1618 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce
Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries
Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
H. T. Rasanen, H. I. Manninen, R. L. Vanninen, P. Vainio, M. Berg, and T. Saari
Mild Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis : Assessment by 3-Dimensional Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography, With Reference to Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging and Contrast Angiography
Stroke, April 1, 1999; 30(4): 827 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.