Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamashita, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamashita, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, M.

Radiology, Vol 193, 59-65, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions: role of spin-echo and contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging

Y Yamashita, Y Hatanaka, H Yamamoto, A Arakawa, T Matsukawa, T Miyazaki and M Takahashi
Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Japan.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of spin-echo (SE) and contrast material- enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional T1- and T2-weighted SE and fast low-angle shot dynamic MR imaging were performed in 300 focal liver lesions on a 1.5-T MR imager. Findings at both SE and dynamic imaging were analyzed by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Although considerable overlap existed, signal intensity on T2-weighted images, tumor margin, and internal architecture were significant factors for SE imaging. For dynamic imaging, the hemodynamics and pattern of enhancement were significant factors. A logistic regression analysis revealed 86% of lesions were correctly categorized with these parameters. CONCLUSION: A specific diagnosis of liver lesions can be obtained in most cases by combining parameters obtained from SE and dynamic MR images.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. F. Hanna, N. Kased, S. W. Kwan, A. C. Gamst, A. C. Santosa, T. Hassanein, and C. B. Sirlin
Double-Contrast MRI for Accurate Staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Cirrhosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 47 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J.-S. Yu and N. M. Rofsky
Hepatic metastases: perilesional enhancement on dynamic MRI.
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1051 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Youk, J. M. Lee, and C. S. Kim
MRI for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of Mangafodipir Trisodium and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine Contrast Agents
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1049 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. K. Kim, C. S. Kim, Y. H. Lee, H. S. Kwak, and J. M. Lee
Comparison of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Enhanced and Gadobenate Dimeglumine-Enhanced Dynamic MRI for Detection of Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1217 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Matsuo, M. Kanematsu, K. Itoh, T. Murakami, Y. Maetani, H. Kondo, S. Goshima, N. Kako, H. Hoshi, J. Konishi, et al.
Detection of Malignant Hepatic Tumors with Ferumoxides-Enhanced MRI: Comparison of Five Gradient-Recalled Echo Sequences with Different TEs
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 235 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Matsuo, M. Kanematsu, K. Itoh, K. Ito, Y. Maetani, H. Kondo, N. Kako, N. Matsunaga, H. Hoshi, and J. Shiraishi
Detection of Malignant Hepatic Tumors: Comparison of Gadolinium-and Ferumoxide-Enhanced MR Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2001; 177(3): 637 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Kondo, M. Kanematsu, H. Hoshi, T. Murakami, T. Kim, M. Hori, M. Matsuo, and H. Nakamura
Preoperative Detection of Malignant Hepatic Tumors: Comparison of Combined Methods of MR Imaging with Combined Methods of CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 947 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. T. Sica, H. Ji, and P. R. Ros
CT and MR Imaging of Hepatic Metastases
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 691 - 698.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
V. Vilgrain, L. Boulos, M.-P. Vullierme, A. Denys, B. Terris, and Y. Menu
Imaging of Atypical Hemangiomas of the Liver with Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2000; 20(2): 379 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Pauleit, J. Textor, R. Bachmann, R. Conrad, S. Flacke, G. Layer, B. Kreft, and H. Schild
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Detection with Gadolinium- and Ferumoxides-enhanced MR Imaging of the Liver
Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 73 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.