|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 193, 351-357, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
EL Thurfjell and JA Lindgren
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of a population-based mammography screening program in Uppsala County, Sweden, and to compare the findings with those of the randomized Swedish studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 43,074 women (aged 40-69 years) who were invited to the first screening round. Women aged 40-54 years were examined with two-view mammography, whereas women aged 55-69 years were examined with one-view mammography. During the second screening round, two-view mammography was used to screen dense breasts. RESULTS: The attendance rate was 87% in the first screening round and 78% in the second screening round. The recall rate for further examination was 4.6% in the first round and 5.7% in the second round. On average, five cancers were found per 1,000 women examined in both screening rounds. The rate of advanced breast cancers of stage II or higher decreased statistically significantly from 0.16% in the first screening round to 0.08% in the second screening round (P = .007). CONCLUSION: The results of the Swedish two-county study can be duplicated in clinical practice.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Roubidoux, J. E. Bailey, L. A. Wray, and M. A. Helvie Invasive Cancers Detected after Breast Cancer Screening Yielded a Negative Result: Relationship of Mammographic Density to Tumor Prognostic Factors Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 42 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Berg Rationale for a Trial of Screening Breast Ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666 Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1225 - 1228. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Paquette, J. Snider, F. Bouchard, I. Olivotto, H. Bryant, K. Decker, G. Doyle, and for the Database Management Subcommittee for The C Performance of screening mammography in organized programs in Canada in 1996 Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 1, 2000; 163(9): 1133 - 1138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Feig Age-related Accuracy of Screening Mammography: How Should It Be Measured? Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 633 - 640. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lundgren, E. Szabo, S. Ljunghall, R. Bergström, L. Holmberg, and J. Rastad Population based case-control study of sick leave in postmenopausal women before diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism BMJ, September 26, 1998; 317(7162): 848 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Thurfjell, A. Lindgren, and E. Thurfjell Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Mammographic Appearance as Predictor of Histologic Type Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 165 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |