Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thurfjell, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lindgren, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thurfjell, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lindgren, J. A.

Radiology, Vol 193, 351-357, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Population-based mammography screening in Swedish clinical practice: prevalence and incidence screening in Uppsala County

EL Thurfjell and JA Lindgren
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of a population-based mammography screening program in Uppsala County, Sweden, and to compare the findings with those of the randomized Swedish studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 43,074 women (aged 40-69 years) who were invited to the first screening round. Women aged 40-54 years were examined with two-view mammography, whereas women aged 55-69 years were examined with one-view mammography. During the second screening round, two-view mammography was used to screen dense breasts. RESULTS: The attendance rate was 87% in the first screening round and 78% in the second screening round. The recall rate for further examination was 4.6% in the first round and 5.7% in the second round. On average, five cancers were found per 1,000 women examined in both screening rounds. The rate of advanced breast cancers of stage II or higher decreased statistically significantly from 0.16% in the first screening round to 0.08% in the second screening round (P = .007). CONCLUSION: The results of the Swedish two-county study can be duplicated in clinical practice.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Roubidoux, J. E. Bailey, L. A. Wray, and M. A. Helvie
Invasive Cancers Detected after Breast Cancer Screening Yielded a Negative Result: Relationship of Mammographic Density to Tumor Prognostic Factors
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 42 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. A. Berg
Rationale for a Trial of Screening Breast Ultrasound: American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2003; 180(5): 1225 - 1228.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. Paquette, J. Snider, F. Bouchard, I. Olivotto, H. Bryant, K. Decker, G. Doyle, and for the Database Management Subcommittee for The C
Performance of screening mammography in organized programs in Canada in 1996
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 1, 2000; 163(9): 1133 - 1138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Feig
Age-related Accuracy of Screening Mammography: How Should It Be Measured?
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 633 - 640.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
E. Lundgren, E. Szabo, S. Ljunghall, R. Bergström, L. Holmberg, and J. Rastad
Population based case-control study of sick leave in postmenopausal women before diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism
BMJ, September 26, 1998; 317(7162): 848 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. G. Thurfjell, A. Lindgren, and E. Thurfjell
Nonpalpable Breast Cancer: Mammographic Appearance as Predictor of Histologic Type
Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 165 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.