Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chotas, H. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ravin, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chotas, H. G.
Right arrow Articles by Ravin, C. E.

Radiology, Vol 193, 403-404, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Chest radiography: estimated lung volume and projected area obscured by the heart, mediastinum, and diaphragm

HG Chotas and CE Ravin
Department of Radiology, University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

PURPOSE: To estimate what fraction of the lung volume and projected lung area are obscured by the heart, mediastinum, and diaphragm on frontal chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Digital images from 25 computed tomographic examinations of the chest (10-mm section thickness and spacing) were analyzed, lung regions were identified in each image section, and simulated frontal radiographs were constructed from the resultant data to estimate the obscured-volume and obscured- area fractions for each patient. Means and standard deviations of the measured lung fractions were computed. RESULTS: On average, 26.4% of the lung volume (standard deviation, 5.1) and 43.0% of the lung area (standard deviation, 6.6) were obscured. CONCLUSION: These substantial lung fractions should be considered in the selection of a screen-film system for chest radiography, because the obscured portion of the lung can be poorly imaged if an inappropriate system is chosen.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. R. Jett and D. E. Midthun
Screening for Lung Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions: Thomas A. Neff Lecture
Chest, May 1, 2004; 125(5_suppl): 158S - 162S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J Vassileva
A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2002; 75(898): 837 - 842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.