Radiology, Vol 193, 518-522, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Hepatic CT enhancement. Part II. Alterations in contrast material volume and rate of injection within the same patients

TP Chambers, RL Baron and RM Lush
Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15213-2582.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of alterations in contrast material volume and injection rate on liver computed tomographic (CT) enhancement within the same patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients underwent repeat CT within 6 months, one with 150 mL of nonionic contrast material at 2 mL/sec, the other with 150 mL (n = 8, group A), 100 mL (n = 14, group B), or 180 mL (n = 18, group C) at 3 mL/sec. Comparisons were made only within the same patients. RESULTS: In group A, mean liver enhancement was greater with the higher rate (3 mL/sec) up to 130 seconds after injection, mean peak liver enhancement was greater by 10 HU, and mean time to peak enhancement was shorter by 15 seconds. In group B, mean peak enhancement was greater with 150 mL by 9 HU, and mean time to peak enhancement was longer by 27 seconds. In group C, peak enhancement and time to peak liver enhancement were greater. CONCLUSION: Contrast material volume and injection rate have interdependent effects on liver enhancement and potentially tumor conspicuity. Higher rates compensate partially for lower volume, but enhancement is still reduced. The optimal window of time for imaging after injection varies with injection technique.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.-J. Kim, Y. E. Chung, K. W. Kim, J.-J. Chung, J. S. Lim, Y. T. Oh, and J. H. Kim Variation of the Time to Aortic Enhancement of Fixed-Duration Versus Fixed-Rate Injection Protocols Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 185 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S. Lee, T. K. Kim, J. H. Byun, H. K. Ha, P. N. Kim, A. Y. Kim, S. G. Lee, and M.-G. Lee Hepatic Arteries in Potential Donors for Living Related Liver Transplantation: Evaluation with Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 391 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Ji, J. D. McTavish, K. J. Mortele, W. Wiesner, and P. R. Ros Hepatic Imaging with Multidetector CT RadioGraphics, October 1, 2001; 21(90001): S71 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kim, M. P. Federle, R. L. Baron, M. S. Peterson, and Y. Kawamori Discrimination of Small Hepatic Hemangiomas from Hypervascular Malignant Tumors Smaller than 3 cm with Three-Phase Helical CT Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 699 - 706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. R. Herts, C. M. O'Malley, S. L. Wirth, M. L. Lieber, and B. Pohlman Power Injection of Contrast Media Using Central Venous Catheters: Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 447 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. S. Kuszyk, D. A. Bluemke, M. A. Choti, K. M. Horton, C. A. Magee, and E. K. Fishman Contrast-Enhanced CT of Small Hypovascular Hepatic Tumors: Effect of Lesion Enhancement on Conspicuity in Rabbits Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 471 - 0. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Tublin, F. N. Tessler, S. L. Cheng, T. L. Peters, and P. C. McGovern Effect of Injection Rate of Contrast Medium on Pancreatic and Hepatic Helical CT Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 97 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text]