Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, R.

Radiology, Vol 193, 801-805, Copyright © 1994 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Pulmonary embolism: prediction of the usefulness of initial ventilation- perfusion scanning with chest radiographic findings

SN Goldberg, EL Palmer, JA Scott and R Fisher
Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of ventilation-perfusion scanning when chest radiographic findings are abnormal to decide which patients should initially undergo angiography because of suspected pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 951 patients who underwent examination between April 1, 1992, and August 24, 1993, were reviewed, and the results of ventilation-perfusion scanning and chest radiography were correlated. RESULTS: Approximately 8% of patients with radiographic findings of no acute disease, pleural effusion, and linear atelectasis had high-probability ventilation-perfusion scans. Pulmonary edema and parenchymal consolidation categories had fewer high- probability studies (3% and 1%, respectively; P < .01). The chance of obtaining a nondiagnostic result was similar for the first three categories (12%) but was more likely for pleural effusion and parenchymal consolidation (36% and 82%, respectively; P < .01). CONCLUSION: The results of ventilation-perfusion scanning are not useful with focal radiographic consolidation. It may be appropriate to proceed directly to pulmonary angiography in many of these patients.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1994 by the Radiological Society of North America.