|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 194, 157-163, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
JA Brink, JT Lim, G Wang, JP Heiken, LA Deyoe and MW Vannier
Department of Radiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110.
PURPOSE: To determine empirically the effect of scan parameters and postprocessing techniques on depiction accuracy of renal artery stenosis with spiral computed tomographic angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Critical (85%) and noncritical (45%) stenoses in the coronal plane were modeled in vitro and scanned with 12 combinations of collimation (1, 2, or 3 mm), table increment (pitch = 1-2),2 and reconstruction interval (0.5 or 1.0 mm). Five test images were generated for each spiral scanning technique: multiplanar reformation (MPR), maximum-intensity projections (MIPs: coronal MIP [MIPcor], coronal MIP targeted to phantom vessel and surrounding fat [target MIPcor]), transaxial imaging, and transaxial MIP. RESULTS: With 3-mm collimation, critical stenosis was overestimated to the point of occlusion on MIPcor images and underestimated on MPR and target MIPcor images. A 0.5-mm reconstruction interval was marginally beneficial for 1- and 2-mm collimation, but noise was prohibitive with 1-mm collimation. CONCLUSION: Critical renal artery stenosis is best depicted with 2-mm collimation, 2-4-mm table increment, and 1-mm reconstruction interval.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S ISHIGAKI, S ITOH, K SUZUKI, H SATAKE, T OTA, M IKEDA, and T ISHIGAKI Three-dimensional CT angiography of the pancreatic artery in 16-channel multislice CT: value of scanning with submillimetre collimation Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2008; 81(962): 99 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.B. Ertl-Wagner, R. Bruening, J. Blume, R.-T. Hoffmann, S. Mueller-Schunk, B. Snyder, and M.F. Reiser Relative Value of Sliding-Thin-Slab Multiplanar Reformations and Sliding-Thin-Slab Maximum Intensity Projections as Reformatting Techniques in Multisection CT Angiography of the Cervicocranial Vessels AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 107 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, and T. Kaminaga Accuracy of Automated CT Angiography Measurement of Vascular Diameter in Phantoms: Effect of Size of Display Field of View, Density of Contrast Medium, and Wall Thickness Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1940 - 1944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Kim, E. M. Marom, J. E. Herndon II, and H. P. McAdams Pulmonary Vein Diameter, Cross-sectional Area, and Shape: CT Analysis Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 43 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hirai, Y. Korogi, K. Ono, M. Yamura, S. Uemura, and Y. Yamashita Pseudostenosis Phenomenon at Volume-rendered Three-dimensional Digital Angiography of Intracranial Arteries: Frequency, Location, and Effect on Image Evaluation Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 882 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, T. Kaminaga, and T. Yamauchi Measurement of Vascular Diameter In Vitro by Automated Software for CT Angiography: Effects of Inner Diameter, Density of Contrast Medium, and Convolution Kernel Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1313 - 1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Addis, K. D. Hopper, T. A. Iyriboz, Y. Liu, S. W. Wise, C. J. Kasales, J. S. Blebea, and D. T. Mauger CT Angiography: In Vitro Comparison of Five Reconstruction Methods Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1171 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. D. Patil, A. Ragavan, Nadaraj, K. Murthy, R. Shankar, B. Bastani, and S. H. Ballal Helical CT angiography in evaluation of live kidney donors Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1900 - 1904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liu, K. D. Hopper, D. T. Mauger, and K. A. Addis CT Angiographic Measurement of the Carotid Artery: Optimizing Visualization by Manipulating Window and Level Settings and Contrast Material Attenuation Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 494 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kawashima, C. M. Sandler, R. D. Ernst, E. P. Tamm, S. M. Goldman, and E. K. Fishman CT Evaluation of Renovascular Disease RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): 1321 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Halpern, D. G. Mitchell, R. J. Wechsler, E. K. Outwater, M. J. Moritz, and G. A. Wilson Preoperative Evaluation of Living Renal Donors: Comparison of CT Angiography and MR Angiography Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 434 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ito, R. Blasbalg, S. M. Hussain, and D. G. Mitchell Portal Vein and Its Tributaries: Evaluation with Thin-Section Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Dynamic Fat-suppressed MR Imaging Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 381 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Qanadli, B. Mesurolle, M. Coggia, O. Barre, S. Fukui, O. A. Goeau-Brissonniere, S. Chagnon, and P. Lacombe Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Pretherapy Assessment with Dual-Slice Helical CT Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 181 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T. Johnson, E. J. Halpern, B. S. Kuszyk, D. G. Heath, R. J. Wechsler, L. N. Nazarian, G. A. Gardiner, D. C. Levin, and E. K. Fishman Renal Artery Stenosis: CT Angiography—Comparison of Real-time Volume-rendering and Maximum Intensity Projection Algorithms Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 337 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |