Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brink, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vannier, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brink, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vannier, M. W.

Radiology, Vol 194, 157-163, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Technical optimization of spiral CT for depiction of renal artery stenosis: in vitro analysis

JA Brink, JT Lim, G Wang, JP Heiken, LA Deyoe and MW Vannier
Department of Radiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110.

PURPOSE: To determine empirically the effect of scan parameters and postprocessing techniques on depiction accuracy of renal artery stenosis with spiral computed tomographic angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Critical (85%) and noncritical (45%) stenoses in the coronal plane were modeled in vitro and scanned with 12 combinations of collimation (1, 2, or 3 mm), table increment (pitch = 1-2),2 and reconstruction interval (0.5 or 1.0 mm). Five test images were generated for each spiral scanning technique: multiplanar reformation (MPR), maximum-intensity projections (MIPs: coronal MIP [MIPcor], coronal MIP targeted to phantom vessel and surrounding fat [target MIPcor]), transaxial imaging, and transaxial MIP. RESULTS: With 3-mm collimation, critical stenosis was overestimated to the point of occlusion on MIPcor images and underestimated on MPR and target MIPcor images. A 0.5-mm reconstruction interval was marginally beneficial for 1- and 2-mm collimation, but noise was prohibitive with 1-mm collimation. CONCLUSION: Critical renal artery stenosis is best depicted with 2-mm collimation, 2-4-mm table increment, and 1-mm reconstruction interval.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S ISHIGAKI, S ITOH, K SUZUKI, H SATAKE, T OTA, M IKEDA, and T ISHIGAKI
Three-dimensional CT angiography of the pancreatic artery in 16-channel multislice CT: value of scanning with submillimetre collimation
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2008; 81(962): 99 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
B.B. Ertl-Wagner, R. Bruening, J. Blume, R.-T. Hoffmann, S. Mueller-Schunk, B. Snyder, and M.F. Reiser
Relative Value of Sliding-Thin-Slab Multiplanar Reformations and Sliding-Thin-Slab Maximum Intensity Projections as Reformatting Techniques in Multisection CT Angiography of the Cervicocranial Vessels
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 107 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, and T. Kaminaga
Accuracy of Automated CT Angiography Measurement of Vascular Diameter in Phantoms: Effect of Size of Display Field of View, Density of Contrast Medium, and Wall Thickness
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1940 - 1944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y.-H. Kim, E. M. Marom, J. E. Herndon II, and H. P. McAdams
Pulmonary Vein Diameter, Cross-sectional Area, and Shape: CT Analysis
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Hirai, Y. Korogi, K. Ono, M. Yamura, S. Uemura, and Y. Yamashita
Pseudostenosis Phenomenon at Volume-rendered Three-dimensional Digital Angiography of Intracranial Arteries: Frequency, Location, and Effect on Image Evaluation
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 882 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, T. Kaminaga, and T. Yamauchi
Measurement of Vascular Diameter In Vitro by Automated Software for CT Angiography: Effects of Inner Diameter, Density of Contrast Medium, and Convolution Kernel
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1313 - 1317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. A. Addis, K. D. Hopper, T. A. Iyriboz, Y. Liu, S. W. Wise, C. J. Kasales, J. S. Blebea, and D. T. Mauger
CT Angiography: In Vitro Comparison of Five Reconstruction Methods
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1171 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
U. D. Patil, A. Ragavan, Nadaraj, K. Murthy, R. Shankar, B. Bastani, and S. H. Ballal
Helical CT angiography in evaluation of live kidney donors
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1900 - 1904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Liu, K. D. Hopper, D. T. Mauger, and K. A. Addis
CT Angiographic Measurement of the Carotid Artery: Optimizing Visualization by Manipulating Window and Level Settings and Contrast Material Attenuation
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 494 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Kawashima, C. M. Sandler, R. D. Ernst, E. P. Tamm, S. M. Goldman, and E. K. Fishman
CT Evaluation of Renovascular Disease
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2000; 20(5): 1321 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. J. Halpern, D. G. Mitchell, R. J. Wechsler, E. K. Outwater, M. J. Moritz, and G. A. Wilson
Preoperative Evaluation of Living Renal Donors: Comparison of CT Angiography and MR Angiography
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 434 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Ito, R. Blasbalg, S. M. Hussain, and D. G. Mitchell
Portal Vein and Its Tributaries: Evaluation with Thin-Section Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Dynamic Fat-suppressed MR Imaging
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 381 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. D. Qanadli, B. Mesurolle, M. Coggia, O. Barre, S. Fukui, O. A. Goeau-Brissonniere, S. Chagnon, and P. Lacombe
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Pretherapy Assessment with Dual-Slice Helical CT Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 181 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. T. Johnson, E. J. Halpern, B. S. Kuszyk, D. G. Heath, R. J. Wechsler, L. N. Nazarian, G. A. Gardiner, D. C. Levin, and E. K. Fishman
Renal Artery Stenosis: CT Angiography—Comparison of Real-time Volume-rendering and Maximum Intensity Projection Algorithms
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 337 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.