Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tigges, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tigges, S.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. E.

Radiology, Vol 194, 73-75, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Hip arthroplasty: the role of plain radiographs in outpatient management

S Tigges, JR Roberson and DE Cohen
Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322.

PURPOSE: To determine whether findings on plain radiographs alter clinical care in outpatient management after hip arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 1, 1993, through February 28, 1994, one arthroplasty surgeon saw 148 outpatients (age range, 15-86 years) after hip arthroplasty (163 prostheses). The surgeon made decisions about clinical management before he reviewed the plain hip radiographs. After he reviewed the radiographs, he recorded any changes in the management plan. RESULTS: In only one case did the radiographic findings change patient treatment. The prosthesis in this relatively asymptomatic patient had been in place for over 9 years and appeared clinically to be functioning well, but radiographs demonstrated aggressive granulomatosis. Therefore, the patient underwent revision arthroplasty. In the remaining 147 patients, radiographic findings had no impact on clinical management. CONCLUSION: Radiographic evaluation may be most beneficial in patients with hip prostheses that have been in place for many years to rule out asymptomatic bone loss due to aggressive granulomatosis.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.