Radiology, Vol 194, 365-371, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Professional and business characteristics of radiology groups in the United States: 1992

JH Sunshine and S Bansal
American College of Radiology, Reston, VA 22091.

PURPOSE: In response to requests, to present information on the professional and business characteristics of radiology groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Radiology surveyed a stratified random sample of radiology groups, defining radiology group as any practice with two or more radiologists or radiation oncologists, including academic departments, units in multispecialty groups, and staff of government facilities. The 465 responses (69% response rate) were weighted so the data show what findings would have been if all radiology groups in the country had responded. RESULTS: ACR professional standards are widely used, particularly those for mammography and radiation oncology. Seventy-eight percent of groups required continuing training of their technologists. On average, groups required 2.7 years for new members to become full partners. The average group gave full-time radiologists 11 holidays, 26 vacation days, and 11 days for continuing medical education each year. On average, groups collected 71% of total billings. Net collections (after "allowances" for Blue Shield, Medicare, and other payers are deducted from billings) averaged 86%; half of services were provided by groups with net collection rates of 90% or more. CONCLUSION: In general, changes since 1989 (when the previous Group Practice Survey was conducted) were small.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. Sunshine and Y. S. Cypel Types of Procedures Performed by Diagnostic Radiology Practices: Past Patterns and Future Directions Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1193 - 1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Hogan and J. H. Sunshine Financial Ratios in Diagnostic Radiology Practices: Variability and Trends Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 774 - 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. H. Deitch and J. H. Sunshine The Relationship of Managed Care To Business, Professional, and Organizational Aspects of Radiology Practices Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 29 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. S. Cypel and J. H. Sunshine Characteristics of Mixed Diagnostic Radiology-Radiation Oncology Practices Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 643 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. S. Cypel and J. H. Sunshine Basic Characteristics of Radiology Practices: Results from the American College of Radiology's 1999 Survey Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 341 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. Gray, W. Hollingworth, C. C. Blackmore, M. A. Alotis, B. I. Martin, S. D. Sullivan, R. A. Deyo, and J. G. Jarvik Conventional Radiography, Rapid MR Imaging, and Conventional MR Imaging for Low Back Pain: Activity-based Costs and Reimbursement Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 669 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Sunshine, Y. S. Cypel, and B. Schepps Diagnostic Radiologists in 2000: Basic Characteristics, Practices, and Issues Related to the Radiologist Shortage Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 291 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Sunshine, J. H. Burkhardt, and M. R. Mabry Practice Costs in Diagnostic Radiology Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 854 - 865. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. I. Bluth, J. H. Sunshine, J. B. Lyons, C. A. Beam, L. A. Troxclair, L. Althans-Kopecky, P. E. Crewson, M. A. Sullivan, D. H. Smetherman, P. A. Heidenreich, et al. Power Doppler Imaging: Initial Evaluation as a Screening Examination for Carotid Artery Stenosis Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 791 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text]