Radiology, Vol 194, 757-764, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Cost-effectiveness of MR angiography in cases of limb-threatening peripheral vascular disease

D Yin, RA Baum, JP Carpenter, CP Langlotz and MJ Pentecost
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the preoperative planning of treatment in patients with limb-threatening peripheral vascular disease (PVD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision model was developed to study the effects of MR angiography on the outcome and cost of treatment. The authors calculated the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained (ie, cost-effectiveness ratio) when conventional angiography was replaced or supplemented with MR angiography. Previously reported data regarding the accuracies of MR and conventional angiography were used in the analysis. RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness ratio of MR angiography ranged from negative (cost-reducing) values to $78,000. For the base case in which the sensitivity and specificity of MR angiography for the evaluation of inflow vessels were 92% and 88% and those of conventional angiography were 97% and 97%, respectively, the cost-effectiveness ratio was $25,895. CONCLUSION: MR angiography may be a cost-effective alternative to conventional angiography in patients with limb-threatening PVD if its accuracy for the inflow evaluation reaches certain thresholds. Further prospective investigation is warranted.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Swan, W. F. Lawrence, and J. Roy Process utility in breast biopsy. Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 347 - 359. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. S. Medina, E. Aguirre, B. Bernal, and N. R. Altman Functional MR Imaging versus Wada Test for Evaluation of Language Lateralization: Cost Analysis Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 49 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. K. Willmann, S. Wildermuth, T. Pfammatter, J. E. Roos, B. Seifert, P. R. Hilfiker, B. Marincek, and D. Weishaupt Aortoiliac and Renal Arteries: Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Angiography and Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 798 - 811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Swan, T. J. Carroll, T. W. Kennell, D. M. Heisey, F. R. Korosec, R. Frayne, C. A. Mistretta, and T. M. Grist Time-resolved Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the Peripheral Vessels Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 43 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. D. Rubin, M. D. Armerding, M. D. Dake, and S. Napel Cost Identification of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Imaging by Using Time and Motion Analyses Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 63 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. S. Swan, D. G. Fryback, W. F. Lawrence, F. Sainfort, M. E. Hagenauer, and D. M. Heisey A Time-tradeoff Method for Cost--Efifectiveness Models Applied to Radiology Med Decis Making, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 79 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. K. Yucel, C. M. Anderson, R. R. Edelman, T. M. Grist, R. A. Baum, W. J. Manning, A. Culebras, and W. Pearce Magnetic Resonance Angiography : Update on Applications for Extracranial Arteries Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2284 - 2301. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.G. M. Hunink and G. P. Krestin Study Design for Concurrent Development, Assessment, and Implementation of New Diagnostic Imaging Technology Radiology, March 1, 2002; 222(3): 604 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]