Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soo, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soo, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, D. C.

Radiology, Vol 194, 863-866, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Seromas in residual fibrous capsules after explantation: mammographic and sonographic appearances

MS Soo, PJ Kornguth, GS Georgiade and DC Sullivan
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the mammographic and sonographic findings associated with seromas that develop in residual fibrous capsules after explantation of breast prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative mammograms were reviewed in 86 patients (mean age, 51 years; age range, 24-71 years) who had undergone surgical explantation of breast prostheses. Six seromas were found in four patients 46-68 years of age. Imaging findings were correlated with surgical and laboratory results for three seromas. A presumptive diagnosis was made of the other three lesions. RESULTS: Mammograms demonstrated all seromas as large, elliptic, water-opacity masses, some with well- circumscribed and some with irregular borders. Sonograms showed thin, compressible masses, two of which were flat and anechoic and one of which was hypoechoic. Three patients' images were initially misinterpreted, leading to excision of two seromas and aspiration of one. Seromas were not identified in patients whose implants were removed by means of complete capsulectomy. CONCLUSION: Radiologists must be aware of the imaging findings associated with seromas and of a patient's surgical history to avoid biopsy of benign lesions.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.