Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schweitzer, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tahmoush, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schweitzer, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Tahmoush, A. J.

Radiology, Vol 195, 211-214, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy revisited: MR imaging findings before and after infusion of contrast material

ME Schweitzer, S Mandel, RJ Schwartzman, RL Knobler and AJ Tahmoush
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

PURPOSE: To determine the appearance of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty- one patients with suspected RSD were prospectively evaluated at MR imaging with T1- and T2-weighted sequences and T1-weighted sequences with fat suppression before and after the intravenous administration of contrast material. RESULTS: RSD was confirmed in 45 patients. In 35 patients with stage 1 RSD, skin thickening (31 patients), tissue enhancement with contrast material (31 patients), and soft-tissue edema (six patients) were demonstrated. In five patients with stage 2 RSD, skin thickening (two patients), skin thinning (two patients), and infrequent contrast material enhancement (one patient) were demonstrated. There was no edema in this group of patients. In five patients with stage 3 RSD, inconsistent skin changes were also demonstrated; however, muscle atrophy (four patients) was demonstrated in this stage only. CONCLUSION: MR imaging was beneficial in the demonstration of soft-tissue abnormalities in patients with RSD. MR imaging may also help stage RSD, particularly stages 1 and 3.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. B. Smith, A. G. Kane, A. H. Sholes, and J. H. Freeman
Resolution of an Aggressive Ideopathic Diskitis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1008 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
A. T. Marshall and A. J. Crisp
Reflex sympathetic dystrophy
Rheumatology, July 1, 2000; 39(7): 692 - 695.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Zanetti, C. L. Steiner, B. Seifert, and J. Hodler
Clinical Outcome of Edema-like Bone Marrow Abnormalities of the Foot
Radiology, January 1, 2002; 222(1): 184 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.