Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Megibow, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Heiken, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Megibow, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Heiken, J. P.

Radiology, Vol 195, 327-332, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability--report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group

AJ Megibow, XH Zhou, H Rotterdam, IR Francis, EA Zerhouni, DM Balfe, JC Weinreb, A Aisen, J Kuhlman and JP Heiken
Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016, USA.

PURPOSE: To compare findings with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to determine optimal pulse sequences for MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans and MR images were compared of 189 adult patients with known or suspected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Levels of confidence were correlated with surgical and pathologic results. RESULTS: The accuracy of CT was 0.73 and of MR imaging was 0.70. The negative predictive value of CT was 0.28 and of MR imaging was 0.23. The positive predictive value of CT was 0.89 and of MR imaging was 0.88. Gradient- echo and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences ranked equally in evaluation of vascular invasion, T1-weighted spin-echo sequences were preferred for assessing lymphadenopathy, and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences were preferred for detecting hepatic metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Cross- sectional imaging modalities are useful in the identification of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. CT is recommended for initial imaging assessment.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Kondo, M. Kanematsu, S. Goshima, T. Miyoshi, Y. Shiratori, M. Onozuka, N. Moriyama, and K. T. Bae
MDCT of the Pancreas: Optimizing Scanning Delay with a Bolus-Tracking Technique for Pancreatic, Peripancreatic Vascular, and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 751 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Goshima, M. Kanematsu, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, T. Miyoshi, H. Kato, Y. Tsuge, Y. Shiratori, H. Hoshi, M. Onozuka, et al.
Pancreas: Optimal Scan Delay for Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 167 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
Pancreatic Section
Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas
Gut, June 1, 2005; 54(suppl_5): v1 - v16.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
D. E. Rivadeneira, M. Pochapin, S. R. Grobmyer, M. D. Lieberman, P. J. Christos, I. Jacobson, and J. M. Daly
Comparison of Linear Array Endoscopic Ultrasound and Helical Computed Tomography for the Staging of Periampullary Malignancies
Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 10(8): 890 - 897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. J. Roche, M. L. Hughes, C. J. Garvey, F. Campbell, D. A. White, L. Jones, and J. P. Neoptolemos
CT and Pathologic Assessment of Prospective Nodal Staging in Patients with Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Head of the Pancreas
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 475 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. W. Prokesch, L. C. Chow, C. F. Beaulieu, M. Nino-Murcia, R. E. Mindelzun, R. Bammer, J. Huang, and R. B. Jeffrey Jr
Local Staging of Pancreatic Carcinoma with Multi-Detector Row CT: Use of Curved Planar Reformations—Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 759 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Schima, R. Fugger, E. Schober, C. Oettl, P. Wamser, F. Grabenwoger, J. M. Ryan, and G. Novacek
Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer: Comparison of Mangafodipir Trisodium--Enhanced MR Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Helical Hydro-CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 717 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. M. Horton and E. K. Fishman
Multidetector CT Angiography of Pancreatic Carcinoma: Part 2, Evaluation of Venous Involvement
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 833 - 836.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A Melville, A Eastwood, E Morris, and D Forman
Management of upper gastrointestinal cancers
Qual. Saf. Health Care, March 1, 2001; 10(1): 57 - 64.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Kanematsu, Y. Shiratori, H. Hoshi, H. Kondo, M. Matsuo, and H. Moriwaki
Pancreas and Peripancreatic Vessels: Effect of Imaging Delay on Gadolinium Enhancement at Dynamic Gradient-Recalled-Echo MR Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 95 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Nishiharu, Y. Yamashita, Y. Abe, K. Mitsuzaki, T. Tsuchigame, Y. Nakayama, and M. Takahashi
Local Extension of Pancreatic Carcinoma: Assessment with Thin-Section Helical CT versus with Breath-hold Fast MR Imaging—ROC Analysis
Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 445 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. C. Levin, V. M. Rao, R. L. Bree, and H. L. Neiman
Turf Battles in Radiology: How the Radiology Community Can Collectively Respond to the Challenge
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 301 - 305.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. N. Low, R. C. Semelka, S. Worawattanakul, G. D. Alzate, and J. S. Sigeti
Extrahepatic Abdominal Imaging in Patients with Malignancy: Comparison of MR Imaging and Helical CT, with Subsequent Surgical Correlation
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 625 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. J. Aschoff, J. Görich, R. Sokiranski, A. Rieber, H.-J. Brambs, and S. C. Krämer
Pancreas: Does Hyoscyamine Butylbromide Increase the Diagnostic Value of Helical CT?
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 861 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. Tublin, F. N. Tessler, S. L. Cheng, T. L. Peters, and P. C. McGovern
Effect of Injection Rate of Contrast Medium on Pancreatic and Hepatic Helical CT
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 97 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Lepanto, Y. Arzoumanian, D. Gianfelice, P. Perreault, M. Dagenais, R. Lapointe, R. Letourneau, and A. Roy
Helical CT with CT Angiography in Assessing Periampullary Neoplasms: Identification of Vascular Invasion
Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 347 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.