|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 195, 327-332, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
AJ Megibow, XH Zhou, H Rotterdam, IR Francis, EA Zerhouni, DM Balfe, JC Weinreb, A Aisen, J Kuhlman and JP Heiken
Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016, USA.
PURPOSE: To compare findings with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to determine optimal pulse sequences for MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans and MR images were compared of 189 adult patients with known or suspected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Levels of confidence were correlated with surgical and pathologic results. RESULTS: The accuracy of CT was 0.73 and of MR imaging was 0.70. The negative predictive value of CT was 0.28 and of MR imaging was 0.23. The positive predictive value of CT was 0.89 and of MR imaging was 0.88. Gradient- echo and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences ranked equally in evaluation of vascular invasion, T1-weighted spin-echo sequences were preferred for assessing lymphadenopathy, and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences were preferred for detecting hepatic metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Cross- sectional imaging modalities are useful in the identification of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. CT is recommended for initial imaging assessment.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Kondo, M. Kanematsu, S. Goshima, T. Miyoshi, Y. Shiratori, M. Onozuka, N. Moriyama, and K. T. Bae MDCT of the Pancreas: Optimizing Scanning Delay with a Bolus-Tracking Technique for Pancreatic, Peripancreatic Vascular, and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 751 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goshima, M. Kanematsu, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, T. Miyoshi, H. Kato, Y. Tsuge, Y. Shiratori, H. Hoshi, M. Onozuka, et al. Pancreas: Optimal Scan Delay for Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 167 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Pancreatic Section Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas Gut, June 1, 2005; 54(suppl_5): v1 - v16. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Rivadeneira, M. Pochapin, S. R. Grobmyer, M. D. Lieberman, P. J. Christos, I. Jacobson, and J. M. Daly Comparison of Linear Array Endoscopic Ultrasound and Helical Computed Tomography for the Staging of Periampullary Malignancies Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 10(8): 890 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Roche, M. L. Hughes, C. J. Garvey, F. Campbell, D. A. White, L. Jones, and J. P. Neoptolemos CT and Pathologic Assessment of Prospective Nodal Staging in Patients with Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Head of the Pancreas Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 475 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Prokesch, L. C. Chow, C. F. Beaulieu, M. Nino-Murcia, R. E. Mindelzun, R. Bammer, J. Huang, and R. B. Jeffrey Jr Local Staging of Pancreatic Carcinoma with Multi-Detector Row CT: Use of Curved Planar Reformations—Initial Experience Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 759 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Schima, R. Fugger, E. Schober, C. Oettl, P. Wamser, F. Grabenwoger, J. M. Ryan, and G. Novacek Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer: Comparison of Mangafodipir Trisodium--Enhanced MR Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Helical Hydro-CT Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 717 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Horton and E. K. Fishman Multidetector CT Angiography of Pancreatic Carcinoma: Part 2, Evaluation of Venous Involvement Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 833 - 836. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Melville, A Eastwood, E Morris, and D Forman Management of upper gastrointestinal cancers Qual. Saf. Health Care, March 1, 2001; 10(1): 57 - 64. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kanematsu, Y. Shiratori, H. Hoshi, H. Kondo, M. Matsuo, and H. Moriwaki Pancreas and Peripancreatic Vessels: Effect of Imaging Delay on Gadolinium Enhancement at Dynamic Gradient-Recalled-Echo MR Imaging Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 95 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishiharu, Y. Yamashita, Y. Abe, K. Mitsuzaki, T. Tsuchigame, Y. Nakayama, and M. Takahashi Local Extension of Pancreatic Carcinoma: Assessment with Thin-Section Helical CT versus with Breath-hold Fast MR Imaging—ROC Analysis Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 445 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Levin, V. M. Rao, R. L. Bree, and H. L. Neiman Turf Battles in Radiology: How the Radiology Community Can Collectively Respond to the Challenge Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 301 - 305. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Low, R. C. Semelka, S. Worawattanakul, G. D. Alzate, and J. S. Sigeti Extrahepatic Abdominal Imaging in Patients with Malignancy: Comparison of MR Imaging and Helical CT, with Subsequent Surgical Correlation Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 625 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Aschoff, J. Görich, R. Sokiranski, A. Rieber, H.-J. Brambs, and S. C. Krämer Pancreas: Does Hyoscyamine Butylbromide Increase the Diagnostic Value of Helical CT? Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 861 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Tublin, F. N. Tessler, S. L. Cheng, T. L. Peters, and P. C. McGovern Effect of Injection Rate of Contrast Medium on Pancreatic and Hepatic Helical CT Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 97 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lepanto, Y. Arzoumanian, D. Gianfelice, P. Perreault, M. Dagenais, R. Lapointe, R. Letourneau, and A. Roy Helical CT with CT Angiography in Assessing Periampullary Neoplasms: Identification of Vascular Invasion Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 347 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |