Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollett, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jeffrey, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hollett, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jeffrey, R. B., Jr

Radiology, Vol 195, 359-361, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Quantitative evaluation of pancreatic enhancement during dual-phase helical CT

MD Hollett, MJ Jorgensen and RB Jeffrey Jr
Department of Radiology, Stanford University Hospital, CA 94305, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the improvement in pancreatic enhancement at helical computed tomography (CT) performed with an early delay after administration of contrast material compared with that performed with a standard delay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dual-phase helical CT of the abdomen was performed in 120 patients with a 150-mL bolus of contrast material infused at 5 mL/sec. Early and standard delayed scanning was performed beginning at 20 seconds and 49-71 seconds, respectively. Regions of interest were measured in the head, body, and tail of the pancreas in 92 patients. The difference in enhancement between early and standard delayed scanning was calculated. RESULTS: Mean pancreatic enhancement was 82 HU +/- 3 (standard error) with an early delay, whereas enhancement on standard delay scans was 62 HU +/- 2 (P < .001). An improvement in enhancement greater than 10 HU was attained in 66 of 92 cases (72%). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic enhancement at helical CT with an early delay after contrast material administration is often significantly greater than the enhancement seen with a standard delay when a monophasic, rapidly infused bolus of contrast material is used.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. L. Chu, B. N. Joe, A. C. A. Westphalen, E. M. Webb, F. V. Coakley, and B. M. Yeh
Patient-specific Time to Peak Abdominal Organ Enhancement Varies with Time to Peak Aortic Enhancement at MR Imaging
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 779 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. D. D. Brennan, G. A. Zamboni, V. D. Raptopoulos, and J. B. Kruskal
Comprehensive Preoperative Assessment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with 64-Section Volumetric CT
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1653 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Kondo, M. Kanematsu, S. Goshima, T. Miyoshi, Y. Shiratori, M. Onozuka, N. Moriyama, and K. T. Bae
MDCT of the Pancreas: Optimizing Scanning Delay with a Bolus-Tracking Technique for Pancreatic, Peripancreatic Vascular, and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 751 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. Schueller, W. Schima, C. Schueller-Weidekamm, M. Weber, A. Stift, M. Gnant, and R. Prokesch
Multidetector CT of Pancreas: Effects of Contrast Material Flow Rate and Individualized Scan Delay on Enhancement of Pancreas and Tumor Contrast
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Goshima, M. Kanematsu, H. Kondo, R. Yokoyama, T. Miyoshi, H. Kato, Y. Tsuge, Y. Shiratori, H. Hoshi, M. Onozuka, et al.
Pancreas: Optimal Scan Delay for Contrast-enhanced Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 167 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Takeshima, T. Kumada, H. Toyoda, S. Kiriyama, M. Tanikawa, H. Ichikawa, T. Kawachi, and S. Ogawa
Comparison of IV Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and Histopathology of Pancreatic Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1193 - 1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Imbriaco, A. J. Megibow, A. Ragozzino, R. Liuzzi, P. Mainenti, S. Bortone, L. Camera, and M. Salvatore
Value of the Single-Phase Technique in MDCT Assessment of Pancreatic Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2005; 184(4): 1111 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. L. Bronstein, E. M. Loyer, H. Kaur, H. Choi, C. David, R. A. DuBrow, L. D. Broemeling, K. R. Cleary, and C. Charnsangavej
Detection of Small Pancreatic Tumors with Multiphasic Helical CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2004; 182(3): 619 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. G. Fletcher, M. J. Wiersema, M. A. Farrell, J. L. Fidler, L. J. Burgart, T. Koyama, C. D. Johnson, D. H. Stephens, E. M. Ward, and W. S. Harmsen
Pancreatic Malignancy: Value of Arterial, Pancreatic, and Hepatic Phase Imaging with Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 81 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. W. Prokesch, L. C. Chow, C. F. Beaulieu, R. Bammer, and R. B. Jeffrey Jr
Isoattenuating Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at Multi-Detector Row CT: Secondary Signs
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 764 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Imbriaco, A. J. Megibow, L. Camera, L. Pace, P. P. Mainenti, M. Romano, G. Selva, and M. Salvatore
Dual-Phase Versus Single-Phase Helical CT to Detect and Assess Resectability of Pancreatic Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1473 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. Oshikawa, S. Tanaka, T. Ioka, A. Nakaizumi, Y. Hamada, and T. Mitani
Dynamic Sonography of Pancreatic Tumors: Comparison with Dynamic CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2002; 178(5): 1133 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. J. McNulty, I. R. Francis, J. F. Platt, R. H. Cohan, M. Korobkin, and A. Gebremariam
Multi-Detector Row Helical CT of the Pancreas: Effect of Contrast-enhanced Multiphasic Imaging on Enhancement of the Pancreas, Peripancreatic Vasculature, and Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 97 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Hidajat, M. Wolf, A. Nunnemann, P. Liersch, B. Gebauer, U. Teichgräber, R. J. Schröder, and R. Felix
Survey of Conventional and Spiral CT Doses
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 395 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Ichikawa, M. S. Peterson, M. P. Federle, R. L. Baron, H. Haradome, Y. Kawamori, S. Nawano, and T. Araki
Islet Cell Tumor of the Pancreas: Biphasic CT versus MR Imaging in Tumor Detection
Radiology, July 1, 2000; 216(1): 163 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. A. Urban and E. K. Fishman
Tailored Helical CT Evaluation of Acute Abdomen : (CME available in print version and on RSNA Link)
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2000; 20(3): 725 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. D. Hopper, K. Singapuri, and A. Finkel
Body CT and Oncologic Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 27 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Kanematsu, Y. Shiratori, H. Hoshi, H. Kondo, M. Matsuo, and H. Moriwaki
Pancreas and Peripancreatic Vessels: Effect of Imaging Delay on Gadolinium Enhancement at Dynamic Gradient-Recalled-Echo MR Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 95 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Nishiharu, Y. Yamashita, Y. Abe, K. Mitsuzaki, T. Tsuchigame, Y. Nakayama, and M. Takahashi
Local Extension of Pancreatic Carcinoma: Assessment with Thin-Section Helical CT versus with Breath-hold Fast MR Imaging—ROC Analysis
Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 445 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Kim, T. Murakami, S. Takahashi, A. Okada, M. Hori, Y. Narumi, and H. Nakamura
Pancreatic CT Imaging: Effects of Different Injection Rates and Doses of Contrast Material
Radiology, July 1, 1999; 212(1): 219 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. Tublin, F. N. Tessler, S. L. Cheng, T. L. Peters, and P. C. McGovern
Effect of Injection Rate of Contrast Medium on Pancreatic and Hepatic Helical CT
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 97 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.