|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 195, 501-505, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
WC Peh, TH Farmer and WG Totty
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that acromial shape is comparable on supraspinatus outlet view radiographs and parasagittal magnetic resonance (MR) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Supraspinatus outlet view radiographs of a dried scapula were obtained in the neutral position and with various degrees of caudal, cranial, anterior, and posterior angulation. Sagittal MR images of 41 asymptomatic and 39 symptomatic shoulders were reviewed and compared with outlet view radiographs from the 39 symptomatic cases. Acromial shape was assessed with published classification schemes. RESULTS: Minor variations in angulation produced changes in apparent acromial shape and thickness on the radiographs. MR imaging from a lateral to a more medial section changed the shape or thickness grade in 39 of 41 asymptomatic shoulders. There was poor correlation between findings at radiographic and MR assessment of acromial shape in the symptomatic group. CONCLUSION: Apparent acromial shape is sensitive to minor changes in radiographic technique and MR section viewed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. J. Bureau, M. Beauchamp, E. Cardinal, and P. Brassard Dynamic sonography evaluation of shoulder impingement syndrome. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 216 - 220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Y. Chang, D. A. Moses, J. S. Babb, and M. E. Schweitzer Shoulder Impingement: Objective 3D Shape Analysis of Acromial Morphologic Features Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 497 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Moosikasuwan, T. T. Miller, and B. J. Burke Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical, Radiographic, and US Findings RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1591 - 1607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Sanders and M. D. Miller A Systematic Approach to Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation of Sports Medicine Injuries of the Shoulder Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2005; 33(7): 1088 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Mayerhoefer, M. J. Breitenseher, A. Roposch, C. Treitl, and C. Wurnig Comparison of MRI and Conventional Radiography for Assessment of Acromial Shape Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 671 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. O. von Eisenhart-Rothe, A. Jager, K.-H. Englmeier, T. J. Vogl, and H. Graichen Relevance of Arm Position and Muscle Activity on Three-Dimensional Glenohumeral Translation in Patients with Traumatic and Atraumatic Shoulder Instability Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2002; 30(4): 514 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Miniaci, A. T. Mascia, D. C. Salonen, and E. J. Becker Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Shoulder in Asymptomatic Professional Baseball Pitchers Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2002; 30(1): 66 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |