Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, U.
Right arrow Articles by Grabbe, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, U.
Right arrow Articles by Grabbe, E.

Radiology, Vol 195, 533-538, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

MR imaging-guided breast intervention: experience with two systems

U Fischer, R Vosshenrich, W Doler, A Hamadeh, JW Oestmann and E Grabbe
Department of Radiology, Georg-August Universitat Gottingen, Germany.

PURPOSE: To evaluate two different systems for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided breast intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with 34 lesions detected exclusively with contrast material- enhanced MR imaging underwent 51 interventional procedures (23 needle biopsies and 28 preoperative wire localizations) with two different systems. An add-on device for surface coils was used in 25 cases, and a dedicated single breast biopsy coil was used in 26. For needle biopsies, material was aspirated with nonmagnetic 19.5-gauge needles. For preoperative localizations, nonmagnetic hook wires were used. RESULTS: Surgical excision or follow-up verified the cytologic findings in 19 of the 23 cases sampled for biopsy. Cytologic diagnosis was impossible in three of the 23 cases. One technical failure occurred with the biopsy coil. Open biopsy performed after MR imaging-guided localization successfully removed 26 of the 28 lesions. One missed carcinoma was found at repeat localization and removed. One technical failure occurred with the biopsy coil. In that case, the lesion was close to the chest wall. CONCLUSION: Both systems are suitable for fine- needle biopsy and preoperative localization of lesions seen exclusively on MR images.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Gossmann, C. Bangard, M. Warm, R. K. Schmutzler, P. Mallmann, and K.-J. Lackner
Real-time MR-guided Wire Localization of Breast Lesions by Using an Open 1.0-T Imager: Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 535 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, G. Mason, E. A. Morris, and D. D. Dershaw
Does Size Matter? Positive Predictive Value of MRI-Detected Breast Lesions as a Function of Lesion Size
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 426 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, N. Bracero, E. Morris, C. Thornton, and D. D. Dershaw
MRI-Guided 9-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: Initial Clinical Experience
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 183 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. D. Lehman, E. R. DePeri, S. Peacock, M. D. McDonough, W. B. DeMartini, and J. Shook
Clinical Experience with MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1782 - 1787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. Chen, C. D. Lehman, and K. E. Dee
MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy: Clinical Experience with 14-Gauge Stainless Steel Core Biopsy Needle
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2004; 182(4): 1075 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, E. A. Morris, D. D. Dershaw, C. M. Thornton, K. J. Van Zee, and L. K. Tan
Fast MRI-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy: Initial Experience
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1283 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. C. Siegmann, M. Muller-Schimpfle, F. Schick, C. T. Remy, N. Fersis, P. Ruck, C. Gorriz, and C. D. Claussen
MR Imaging--Detected Breast Lesions: Histopathologic Correlation of Lesion Characteristics and Signal Intensity Data
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1403 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 13 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman
Percutaneous Imaging-Guided Core Breast Biopsy: State of the Art at the Millennium
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2000; 174(5): 1191 - 1199.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.