Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kurman, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheth, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kurman, R. J.

Radiology, Vol 195, 661-665, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Endometrial blood flow analysis in postmenopausal women: can it help differentiate benign from malignant causes of endometrial thickening?

S Sheth, UM Hamper, ME McCollum, CI Caskey, NB Rosenshein and RJ Kurman
Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine if prominent vascularity and low pulsatility index (PI) and resistive index (RI) in endometrial arteries help differentiate carcinoma from benign lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five postmenopausal women with at least 8-mm-thick endometrium at endovaginal ultrasound (US) underwent color duplex Doppler endovaginal US of the endometrium. PI and RI values were recorded from arterial waveforms generated in areas of increased vascularity. RESULTS: At color duplex Doppler endovaginal US, endometrial arterial flow was seen in 23 of 36 (64%) proved benign endometrial lesions. The range of PIs for benign lesions was 0.31-1.77 (mean, 0.72 +/- 0.33 [standard deviation]) and for RIs was 0.27-0.84 (mean, 0.48 +/- 0.13). Arterial vessels were seen in five of nine proved endometrial cancers (56%); the range of PIs was 0.42-1.17 (mean, 0.71 +/- 0.32) and for RIs was 0.34- 0.69 (mean, 0.48 +/- 0.15). Differences in mean PI and RI for benign and malignant lesions were not significant. CONCLUSION: Low-impedance arterial flow is observed in various diseases of the endometrium, and there is an overlap between the PI and RI of benign and malignant lesions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. T. Merce, J. L. Alcazar, C. Lopez, E. Iglesias, S. Bau, J. A. de los Heros, and J. M. Bajo
Clinical Usefulness of 3-Dimensional Sonography and Power Doppler Angiography for Diagnosis of Endometrial Carcinoma
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2007; 26(10): 1279 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S C Williams, C Lopez, A Yoong, and J M McHugo
Developing a robust and efficient pathway for the referral and investigation of women with post-menopausal bleeding using a cut-off of <=4 mm for normal thickness
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2007; 80(957): 719 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. L. Alcazar, S. Ajossa, S. Floris, R. Bargellini, M. Gerada, and S. Guerriero
Reproducibility of Endometrial Vascular Patterns in Endometrial Disease as Assessed by Transvaginal Power Doppler Sonography in Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2006; 25(2): 159 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. L. Alcazar, M. J. Galan, J. A. Minguez, and M. Garcia-Manero
Transvaginal Color Doppler Sonography Versus Sonohysterography in the Diagnosis of Endometrial Polyps
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2004; 23(6): 743 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. C. Fleischer, H. W. Shappell, L. P. Parker, and C. W. Hanemann
Color Doppler Sonography of Endometrial Masses
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2002; 21(8): 861 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.