Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roubidoux, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Paramagul, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roubidoux, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Paramagul, C.

Radiology, Vol 196, 427-431, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography

MA Roubidoux, MA Helvie, NE Lai and C Paramagul
Department of Radiology/TC2910, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor 48109-0326, USA.

PURPOSE: To assess the contribution of mammography in the detection of cancer in the contralateral breast in women with bilateral breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammograms and clinical records of 77 patients with bilateral breast cancer were reviewed in a retrospective study. RESULTS: The contralateral cancer was detected at mammography in 68 of 77 patients (88%) and identified at mammography alone in 50 patients (65%). No statistically significant differences in either mammographic detection rates or stage of the contralateral cancer were noted in patients younger than 50 years (n = 25) compared with those 50 years of age or older (n = 52). Cancers detected at annual screening mammography were of lower stage than cancers in unscreened patients. In the screened group, 41% of tumors were ductal carcinoma in situ alone and 23% were stage II or III, compared with 22% and 50%, respectively, in the unscreened group. CONCLUSION: Mammographic examination and follow-up in patients with unilateral breast cancer allow detection of the majority of contralateral breast cancers and earlier stage cancers.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. J. Kim, E.-K. Kim, J. Y. Kwak, B.-W. Park, S.-I. Kim, J. Sohn, and K. K. Oh
Role of Sonography in the Detection of Contralateral Metachronous Breast Cancer in an Asian Population
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 476 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. J. Kim, E.-K. Kim, J. Y. Kwak, B.-W. Park, S.-I. Kim, and K. K. Oh
Bilateral Synchronous Breast Cancer in an Asian Population: Mammographic and Sonographic Characteristics, Detection Methods, and Staging
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 208 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
T. M. Tuttle, E. B. Habermann, E. H. Grund, T. J. Morris, and B. A. Virnig
Increasing Use of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients: A Trend Toward More Aggressive Surgical Treatment
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2007; 25(33): 5203 - 5209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Pediconi, C. Catalano, A. Roselli, S. Padula, F. Altomari, E. Moriconi, A. M. Pronio, M. A. Kirchin, and R. Passariello
Contrast-enhanced MR Mammography for Evaluation of the Contralateral Breast in Patients with Diagnosed Unilateral Breast Cancer or High-Risk Lesions
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 670 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Liberman, E. A. Morris, C. M. Kim, J. B. Kaplan, A. F. Abramson, J. H. Menell, K. J. Van Zee, and D. D. Dershaw
MR Imaging Findings in the Contralateral Breast of Women with Recently Diagnosed Breast Cancer
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 333 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. E. Sohlich, E. A. Sickles, E. S. Burnside, and K. E. Dee
Interpreting Data from Audits When Screening and Diagnostic Mammography Outcomes Are Combined
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 681 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. E. Dee and E. A. Sickles
Medical Audit of Diagnostic Mammography Examinations: Comparison with Screening Outcomes Obtained Concurrently
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 729 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. T. Stucker, D. M. Ikeda, A.-R. Hartman, T. I. George, K. W. Nowels, S. L. Birdwell, D. Goffinet, and R. W. Carlson
New Bilateral Microcalcifications at Mammography in a Postlactational Woman: Case Report
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 247 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. M. Zonderland, E. G. Coerkamp, J. Hermans, M. J. van de Vijver, and A. E. van Voorthuisen
Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: Contribution of US as an Adjunct to Mammography
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 413 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.