Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohan, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Francis, I. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohan, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Francis, I. R.

Radiology, Vol 196, 445-451, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Renal masses: assessment of corticomedullary-phase and nephrographic- phase CT scans

RH Cohan, LS Sherman, M Korobkin, JC Bass and IR Francis
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of thin-section helical computed tomography (CT) performed during the corticomedullary phase (CMP) and nephrographic phase (NP) of contrast enhancement in the detection and characterization of renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Renal CT scans and medical records of 33 patients were retrospectively reviewed. In all examinations, 5-mm-thick, contiguous, helical-mode scans were obtained before and 40 seconds after initiation of dynamic bolus injection of contrast material (CMP images); 5-mm-thick, contiguous, axial-mode scans were obtained after completion of CMP scanning (NP images). RESULTS: At review of CMP, NP, and combination images, 259, 389, and 417 lesions, respectively, were identified. The greatest difference in detection occurred in the renal medulla, with 25 lesions identified on CMP images and 111 lesions identified on NP images. False- positive results occurred when CMP images were reviewed without NP images. CONCLUSION: CT scans obtained only during the CMP of contrast enhancement fail to depict many renal masses that are easily seen on NP images.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Dyer, D. J. DiSantis, and B. L. McClennan
Simplified Imaging Approach for Evaluation of the Solid Renal Mass in Adults
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 331 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. M. Israel and M. A. Bosniak
How I Do It: Evaluating Renal Masses
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 441 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Y. Lee, J. P. Heiken, P. C. Huettner, and W. Na-ChiangMai
Renal Cell Carcinoma Visible Only During the Corticomedullary Phase of Enhancement
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3_supp): S104 - S106.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Kawashima, T. J. Vrtiska, A. J. LeRoy, R. P. Hartman, C. H. McCollough, and B. F. King Jr
CT Urography
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S35 - S54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Jinzaki, J. D. McTavish, K. H. Zou, P. F. Judy, and S. G. Silverman
Evaluation of Small (<= 3 cm) Renal Masses with MDCT: Benefits of Thin Overlapping Reconstructions
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 223 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. A. Joffe, S. Servaes, S. Okon, and M. Horowitz
Multi-Detector Row CT Urography in the Evaluation of Hematuria
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1441 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
F. V. Coakley and B. M. Yeh
Invited Commentary
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1455 - 1456.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C Walter, M Kruessell, A Gindele, H G Brochhagen, A Gossmann, and P Landwehr
Imaging of renal lesions: evaluation of fast MRI and helical CT
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2003; 76(910): 696 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. R. Herts, D. M. Coll, A. C. Novick, N. Obuchowski, G. Linnell, S. L. Wirth, and M. E. Baker
Enhancement Characteristics of Papillary Renal Neoplasms Revealed on Triphasic Helical CT of the Kidneys
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 367 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Sheth, J. C. Scatarige, K. M. Horton, F. M. Corl, and E. K. Fishman
Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Role of Multidetector CT and Three-dimensional CT
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2001; 21(90001): S237 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
C Fowler and R H Reznek
The indeterminate renal mass
Imaging, April 1, 2001; 13(1): 27 - 43.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. M. Goldman and C. M. Sandler
Genitourinary Imaging: The Past 40 Years
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 313 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. D. Hopper, K. Singapuri, and A. Finkel
Body CT and Oncologic Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 27 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. A. Birnbaum, J. E. Jacobs, C. P. Langlotz, and P. Ramchandani
Assessment of a Bolus-tracking Technique in Helical Renal CT to Optimize Nephrographic Phase Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 87 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. N. Low, R. C. Semelka, S. Worawattanakul, G. D. Alzate, and J. S. Sigeti
Extrahepatic Abdominal Imaging in Patients with Malignancy: Comparison of MR Imaging and Helical CT, with Subsequent Surgical Correlation
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 625 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.