Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gurney, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Swensen, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gurney, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Swensen, S. J.

Radiology, Vol 196, 823-829, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Solitary pulmonary nodules: determining the likelihood of malignancy with neural network analysis

JW Gurney and SJ Swensen
Department of Radiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198-1045, USA.

PURPOSE: To test a neural network in differentiation of benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neural networks were trained and tested on the characteristics of 318 nodules. Predictive accuracy of the network was judged for calibration and discrimination. Network results were compared with those with a simpler Bayesian method. RESULTS: The Brier score was 0.142 (calibration, 0.003; discrimination, 0.139) for the neural network and 0.133 for the Bayesian analysis (calibration, 0.012; discrimination, 0.121). Analysis of the calibration curve revealed no significant difference (P < .05) between the slope (b = 1.09) and the line of identity (b = 1) for the neural network or the Bayesian analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.871 for the neural network and 0.894 for the Bayesian analysis (P < .05). There were 23 and 21 false- positive predictions and 18 and six false-negative predictions for the neural network and Bayesian analysis, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Bayesian method was better than the neural network in prediction of probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, K. Murao, A. Ozawa, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, D. Liu, K. Kawanaka, Y. Funama, S. Morishita, and Y. Yamashita
Pulmonary Nodules: Estimation of Malignancy at Thin-Section Helical CT--Effect of Computer-aided Diagnosis on Performance of Radiologists
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 276 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Fukushima, K. Ashizawa, T. Yamaguchi, N. Matsuyama, H. Hayashi, I. Kida, Y. Imafuku, A. Egawa, S. Kimura, K. Nagaoki, et al.
Application of an Artificial Neural Network to High-Resolution CT: Usefulness in Differential Diagnosis of Diffuse Lung Disease
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 297 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Shiraishi, H. Abe, R. Engelmann, M. Aoyama, H. MacMahon, and K. Doi
Computer-aided Diagnosis to Distinguish Benign from Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Nodules on Radiographs: ROC Analysis of Radiologists' Performance--Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 469 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Eng
Predicting the Presence of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Comparative Analysis of the Artificial Neural Network, Logistic Regression, and Threshold Models
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2002; 179(4): 869 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Matsuki, K. Nakamura, H. Watanabe, T. Aoki, H. Nakata, S. Katsuragawa, and K. Doi
Usefulness of an Artificial Neural Network for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Pulmonary Nodules on High-Resolution CT: Evaluation with Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2002; 178(3): 657 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H.-U. Kauczor, K. Heitmann, C. P. Heussel, D. Marwede, T. Uthmann, and M. Thelen
Automatic Detection and Quantification of Ground-Glass Opacities on High-Resolution CT Using Multiple Neural Networks: Comparison with a Density Mask
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1329 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Nakamura, H. Yoshida, R. Engelmann, H. MacMahon, S. Katsuragawa, T. Ishida, K. Ashizawa, and K. Doi
Computerized Analysis of the Likelihood of Malignancy in Solitary Pulmonary Nodules with Use of Artificial Neural Networks
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 823 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.