Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berg, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zerhouni, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berg, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Zerhouni, E. A.

Radiology, Vol 197, 45-52, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Single- and double- lumen silicone breast implant integrity: prospective evaluation of MR and US criteria

WA Berg, CI Caskey, UM Hamper, JE Kuhlman, ND Anderson, BW Chang, S Sheth and EA Zerhouni
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound (US) criteria for breast implant integrity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-two single-lumen silicone breast implants and 22 bilumen implants were evaluated with surface coil MR imaging and US and surgically removed. MR criteria for implant failure were a collapsed implant shell ("linguine sign"), foci of silicone outside the shell ("noose sign"), and extracapsular gel, US criteria were collapsed shell, low-level echoes within the gel, and "snowstorm" echoes of extracapsular silicone. RESULTS: Among single-lumen implants, MR imaging depicted 39 of 40 ruptures, 14 of 28 with minimal leakage; 49 of 54 intact implants were correctly interpreted. US depicted 26 of 40 ruptured implants, four of 28 with minimal leakage, and 30 of 54 intact implants. Among bilumen implants, MR imaging depicted four of five implants with rupture of both lumina and nine of 10 as intact; US depicted one rupture and helped identify two of 10 as intact. Mammography accurately depicted the status of 29 of 30 bilumen implants with MR imaging correlation. CONCLUSION: MR imaging depicts implant integrity more accurately than US; neither method reliably depicts minimal leakage with shell collapse. Mammography is useful in screening bilumen implant integrity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
L. R. Holmich, S. Friis, J. P. Fryzek, I. M. Vejborg, C. Conrad, S. Sletting, K. Kjoller, J. K. McLaughlin, and J. H. Olsen
Incidence of Silicone Breast Implant Rupture
Arch Surg, July 1, 2003; 138(7): 801 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. A. Berg, T. K. Nguyen, M. S. Middleton, M. S. Soo, G. Pennello, and S. L. Brown
MR Imaging of Extracapsular Silicone from Breast Implants: Diagnostic Pitfalls
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 465 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. L. Brown, M. S. Middleton, W. A. Berg, M. S. Soo, and G. Pennello
Prevalence of Rupture of Silicone Gel Breast Implants Revealed on MR Imaging in a Population of Women in Birmingham, Alabama
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1057 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. I. Caskey, W. A. Berg, U. M. Hamper, S. Sheth, B. W. Chang, and N. D. Anderson
Imaging Spectrum of Extracapsular Silicone: Correlation of US, MR Imaging, Mammographic, and Histopathologic Findings
RadioGraphics, October 1, 1999; 19(90001): 39 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. P. Goldberg, D. S. Egilman, C. Stubbs, H. R. Barthel, O. Barraza, L. G. Meier, J. Sunshine, M. S. Greenwald, and M. Angell
Evaluating the Health Risks of Breast Implants
N. Engl. J. Med., October 10, 1996; 335(15): 1154 - 1156.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.