Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brink, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brink, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, P. C.

Radiology, Vol 197, 83-88, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Hepatic spiral CT: reduction of dose of intravenous contrast material

JA Brink, JP Heiken, HP Forman, SS Sagel, PL Molina and PC Brown
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

PURPOSE: To assess the potential for reduction of contrast material dose in hepatic spiral computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred eighty-seven outpatients were randomized prospectively into nine biphasic and eight uniphasic injection protocols: 75, 100, or 125 mL of 240, 300, or 350 mg of iodine per milliliter of iohexol (18- 44 grams of iodine). Protocols were compared according to the maximum hepatic enhancement (MAX) and the contrast enhancement index (CEI). RESULTS: Uniphasic injection was superior to biphasic injection for all protocols. No statistically significant difference in contrast enhancement was present for 38-44 grams of iodine with the uniphasic technique. Adequate enhancement thresholds (MAX > 50 HU, CEI at 30 HU > 300 HU x sec) were exceeded in more than 70% of heavy patients ( > 183 lb [83 kg]) with uniphasic injection of 38 g. For thin patients ( < 183 lb [83 kg]), uniphasic injection of 26 g produced adequate enhancement. CONCLUSION: Contrast material dose may be reduced by up to 40% in thin patients undergoing hepatic spiral CT after uniphasic injection of contrast material; this may result in substantial cost savings.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. F. Behrendt, A. H. Mahnken, S. Stanzel, P. Seidensticker, E. Jost, R. W. Gunther, and G. Muhlenbruch
Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast Media Concentrations for Combined Abdominal and Thoracic MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 145 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, Y. Tamura, M. Hatemura, and Y. Yamashita
Pancreas: Patient Body Weight tailored Contrast Material Injection Protocol versus Fixed Dose Protocol at Dynamic CT
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 475 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Sultana, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, D. Liu, M. Hatemura, Y. Funama, S. Morishita, and Y. Yamashita
Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Bolus Tracking with a 40-Detector CT Scanner to Time Arterial Phase Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 140 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Orlandini, S. Boini, S. Iochum-Duchamps, T. Batch, X. Zhu, and A. Blum
Assessment of the use of a saline chaser to reduce the volume of contrast medium in abdominal CT.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 511 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Schima, R. Hammerstingl, C. Catalano, L. Marti-Bonmati, E. J. Rummeny, F. T. Montero, A. Dirisamer, B. Westermayer, M. Bellomi, D. Brisbois, et al.
Quadruple-phase MDCT of the liver in patients with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma: effect of contrast material flow rate.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1571 - 1579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, M. Inoue, Y. Yagyu, M. Watanabe, T. Sano, S. Nin, R. Koike, Y. Nishimura, and Y. Yamashita
Moderate versus High Concentration of Contrast Material for Aortic and Hepatic Enhancement and Tumor-to-Liver Contrast at Multi-Detector Row CT
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 682 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, K. Hiraishi, and S. Hori
Effect of Contrast Material Injection Duration and Rate on Aortic Peak Time and Peak Enhancement at Dynamic CT Involving Injection Protocol with Dose Tailored to Patient Weight
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 142 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Haider, M. M. Amitai, D. C. Rappaport, M. E. O'Malley, A. E. Hanbidge, M. Redston, G. A. Lockwood, and S. Gallinger
Multi-Detector Row Helical CT in Preoperative Assessment of Small (<=1.5 cm) Liver Metastases: Is Thinner Collimation Better?
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 137 - 142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Awai, K. Takada, H. Onishi, and S. Hori
Aortic and Hepatic Enhancement and Tumor-to-Liver Contrast: Analysis of the Effect of Different Concentrations of Contrast Material at Multi-Detector Row Helical CT
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 757 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. J. Megibow, G. Jacob, J. P. Heiken, E. K. Paulson, K. D. Hopper, G. Sica, S. Saini, B. A. Birnbaum, R. Redvanley, and E. K. Fishman
Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Volume of Low Osmolality Contrast Medium Needed for Routine Helical Abdominal CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 583 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Yamashita, Y. Komohara, M. Takahashi, M. Uchida, N. Hayabuchi, T. Shimizu, and I. Narabayashi
Abdominal Helical CT: Evaluation of Optimal Doses of Intravenous Contrast Material-A Prospective Randomized Study
Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 718 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. L. Hänninen, T. J. Vogl, R. Felfe, W. Pegios, J. Balzer, W. Clauss, and R. Felix
Detection of Focal Liver Lesions at Biphasic Spiral CT: Randomized Double-Blind Study of the Effect of Iodine Concentration in Contrast Materials
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 403 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. S. Kuszyk, D. A. Bluemke, M. A. Choti, K. M. Horton, C. A. Magee, and E. K. Fishman
Contrast-Enhanced CT of Small Hypovascular Hepatic Tumors: Effect of Lesion Enhancement on Conspicuity in Rabbits
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 471 - 0.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. S. Gierada and K. T. Bae
Gadolinium as a CT Contrast Agent: Assessment in a Porcine Model
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 829 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. W. Mayo-Smith
Administration of a CT Division
Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 319 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.