|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 197, 83-88, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
JA Brink, JP Heiken, HP Forman, SS Sagel, PL Molina and PC Brown
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
PURPOSE: To assess the potential for reduction of contrast material dose in hepatic spiral computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred eighty-seven outpatients were randomized prospectively into nine biphasic and eight uniphasic injection protocols: 75, 100, or 125 mL of 240, 300, or 350 mg of iodine per milliliter of iohexol (18- 44 grams of iodine). Protocols were compared according to the maximum hepatic enhancement (MAX) and the contrast enhancement index (CEI). RESULTS: Uniphasic injection was superior to biphasic injection for all protocols. No statistically significant difference in contrast enhancement was present for 38-44 grams of iodine with the uniphasic technique. Adequate enhancement thresholds (MAX > 50 HU, CEI at 30 HU > 300 HU x sec) were exceeded in more than 70% of heavy patients ( > 183 lb [83 kg]) with uniphasic injection of 38 g. For thin patients ( < 183 lb [83 kg]), uniphasic injection of 26 g produced adequate enhancement. CONCLUSION: Contrast material dose may be reduced by up to 40% in thin patients undergoing hepatic spiral CT after uniphasic injection of contrast material; this may result in substantial cost savings.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. F. Behrendt, A. H. Mahnken, S. Stanzel, P. Seidensticker, E. Jost, R. W. Gunther, and G. Muhlenbruch Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast Media Concentrations for Combined Abdominal and Thoracic MDCT Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 145 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yanaga, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, Y. Tamura, M. Hatemura, and Y. Yamashita Pancreas: Patient Body Weight tailored Contrast Material Injection Protocol versus Fixed Dose Protocol at Dynamic CT Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 475 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sultana, K. Awai, Y. Nakayama, T. Nakaura, D. Liu, M. Hatemura, Y. Funama, S. Morishita, and Y. Yamashita Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Bolus Tracking with a 40-Detector CT Scanner to Time Arterial Phase Imaging Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 140 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Orlandini, S. Boini, S. Iochum-Duchamps, T. Batch, X. Zhu, and A. Blum Assessment of the use of a saline chaser to reduce the volume of contrast medium in abdominal CT. Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 511 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Schima, R. Hammerstingl, C. Catalano, L. Marti-Bonmati, E. J. Rummeny, F. T. Montero, A. Dirisamer, B. Westermayer, M. Bellomi, D. Brisbois, et al. Quadruple-phase MDCT of the liver in patients with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma: effect of contrast material flow rate. Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1571 - 1579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Awai, M. Inoue, Y. Yagyu, M. Watanabe, T. Sano, S. Nin, R. Koike, Y. Nishimura, and Y. Yamashita Moderate versus High Concentration of Contrast Material for Aortic and Hepatic Enhancement and Tumor-to-Liver Contrast at Multi-Detector Row CT Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 682 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Awai, K. Hiraishi, and S. Hori Effect of Contrast Material Injection Duration and Rate on Aortic Peak Time and Peak Enhancement at Dynamic CT Involving Injection Protocol with Dose Tailored to Patient Weight Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 142 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Haider, M. M. Amitai, D. C. Rappaport, M. E. O'Malley, A. E. Hanbidge, M. Redston, G. A. Lockwood, and S. Gallinger Multi-Detector Row Helical CT in Preoperative Assessment of Small (<=1.5 cm) Liver Metastases: Is Thinner Collimation Better? Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 137 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Awai, K. Takada, H. Onishi, and S. Hori Aortic and Hepatic Enhancement and Tumor-to-Liver Contrast: Analysis of the Effect of Different Concentrations of Contrast Material at Multi-Detector Row Helical CT Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 757 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Megibow, G. Jacob, J. P. Heiken, E. K. Paulson, K. D. Hopper, G. Sica, S. Saini, B. A. Birnbaum, R. Redvanley, and E. K. Fishman Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Volume of Low Osmolality Contrast Medium Needed for Routine Helical Abdominal CT Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2001; 176(3): 583 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yamashita, Y. Komohara, M. Takahashi, M. Uchida, N. Hayabuchi, T. Shimizu, and I. Narabayashi Abdominal Helical CT: Evaluation of Optimal Doses of Intravenous Contrast Material-A Prospective Randomized Study Radiology, September 1, 2000; 216(3): 718 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Hänninen, T. J. Vogl, R. Felfe, W. Pegios, J. Balzer, W. Clauss, and R. Felix Detection of Focal Liver Lesions at Biphasic Spiral CT: Randomized Double-Blind Study of the Effect of Iodine Concentration in Contrast Materials Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 403 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Kuszyk, D. A. Bluemke, M. A. Choti, K. M. Horton, C. A. Magee, and E. K. Fishman Contrast-Enhanced CT of Small Hypovascular Hepatic Tumors: Effect of Lesion Enhancement on Conspicuity in Rabbits Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 471 - 0. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Gierada and K. T. Bae Gadolinium as a CT Contrast Agent: Assessment in a Porcine Model Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 829 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. Mayo-Smith Administration of a CT Division Radiology, February 1, 2002; 222(2): 319 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |