Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stomper, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Blumenson, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stomper, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Blumenson, L. E.

Radiology, Vol 197, 387-395, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features

PC Stomper, S Herman, DL Klippenstein, JS Winston, SB Edge, MA Arredondo, RV Mazurchuk and LE Blumenson
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, State University at New York (SUNY) at Buffalo 14263, USA.

PURPOSE: To prospectively correlate dynamic contrast enhancement at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with mammographic and pathologic features of suspect breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with 51 breast lesions underwent gadolinium-enhanced spoiled gradient-recalled echo (SPGR) MR imaging at 1.5 T, as well as excisional biopsy or cyst aspiration. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 22 (100%) invasive carcinomas 8 mm or more in diameter, including three (12%) not evident on dense mammograms, enhanced 2.0 or more times the unenhanced intensity. One of three predominantly ductal carcinomas in situ and 10 of 26 (38%) benign lesions enhanced 2.0 or more times. Time-intensity curves were not statistically significantly different among enhancing carcinomas, fibroadenomas, or other benign lesions and showed no statistically significant correlations with pathologic size, nodal status, or hormone receptor status of invasive carcinomas. CONCLUSION: MR imaging enhancement of 2.0 or more times had high sensitivity (100%) for invasive carcinomas 8 mm or more in diameter, with moderate specificity (65%). Time-intensity curves showed no significant difference between enhancement of benign and malignant lesions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadiologyHome page
I. Thomassin-Naggara, M. Bazot, E. Darai, P. Callard, J. Thomassin, and C. A. Cuenod
Epithelial Ovarian Tumors: Value of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and Correlation with Tumor Angiogenesis
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 148 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
S. Bahri, J.-H. Chen, H. J. Yu, A. Kuzucan, O. Nalcioglu, and M.-Y. Su
Can dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) predict tumor recurrence and lymph node status in patients with breast cancer?
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 822 - 824.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
S. Orel
Who Should Have Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation?
J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 703 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Radiol.Home page
A RADJENOVIC, B J DALL, J P RIDGWAY, and M A SMITH
Measurement of pharmacokinetic parameters in histologically graded invasive breast tumours using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2008; 81(962): 120 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
S. A. Jansen, G. M. Newstead, H. Abe, A. Shimauchi, R. A. Schmidt, and G. S. Karczmar
Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Kinetic and Morphologic MR Characteristics Compared with Mammographic Appearance and Nuclear Grade
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 684 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
N. H. G. M. Peters, I. H. M. Borel Rinkes, N. P. A. Zuithoff, W. P. T. M. Mali, K. G. M. Moons, and P. H. M. Peeters
Meta-Analysis of MR Imaging in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 246(1): 116 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
T. C. Williams, W. B. DeMartini, S. C. Partridge, S. Peacock, and C. D. Lehman
Breast MR Imaging: Computer-aided Evaluation Program for Discriminating Benign from Malignant Lesions
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 94 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
F. Pediconi, C. Catalano, A. Roselli, S. Padula, F. Altomari, E. Moriconi, A. M. Pronio, M. A. Kirchin, and R. Passariello
Contrast-enhanced MR Mammography for Evaluation of the Contralateral Breast in Patients with Diagnosed Unilateral Breast Cancer or High-Risk Lesions
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 670 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Narisada, T. Aoki, T. Sasaguri, H. Hashimoto, T. Konishi, M. Morita, and Y. Korogi
Correlation between numeric gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI ratios and prognostic factors and histologic type of breast carcinoma.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 297 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. D. Lehman, S. Peacock, W. B. DeMartini, and X. Chen
A new automated software system to evaluate breast MR examinations: improved specificity without decreased sensitivity.
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 51 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel, M. Rosen, C. Mies, and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging-guided 9-gauge Vacuum-assisted Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 54 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
F. Pediconi, C. Catalano, R. Occhiato, F. Venditti, F. Fraioli, A. Napoli, M. A. Kirchin, and R. Passariello
Breast Lesion Detection and Characterization at Contrast-enhanced MR Mammography: Gadobenate Dimeglumine versus Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 45 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
S. Meisamy, P. J. Bolan, E. H. Baker, M. G. Pollema, C. T. Le, F. Kelcz, M. C. Lechner, B. A. Luikens, R. A. Carlson, K. R. Brandt, et al.
Adding in Vivo Quantitative 1H MR Spectroscopy to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast MR Imaging: Preliminary Results of Observer Performance Study at 4.0 T
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 465 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
N. Hylton
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast: Opportunities to Improve Breast Cancer Management
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1678 - 1684.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
E. E. Deurloo, S. H. Muller, J. L. Peterse, A. P. E. Besnard, and K. G. A. Gilhuijs
Clinically and Mammographically Occult Breast Lesions on MR Images: Potential Effect of Computerized Assessment on Clinical Reading
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 693 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
D. A. Bluemke, C. A. Gatsonis, M. H. Chen, G. A. DeAngelis, N. DeBruhl, S. Harms, S. H. Heywang-Kobrunner, N. Hylton, C. K. Kuhl, C. Lehman, et al.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Prior to Biopsy
JAMA, December 8, 2004; 292(22): 2735 - 2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. V. Knopp, M. W. Bourne, F. Sardanelli, M. N. Wasser, L. Bonomo, C. Boetes, M. Muller-Schimpfle, M. A. Hall-Craggs, B. Hamm, A. Orlacchio, et al.
Gadobenate Dimeglumine-Enhanced MRI of the Breast: Analysis of Dose Response and Comparison with Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2003; 181(3): 663 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
D. K. W. Yeung, W.-T. Yang, and G. M. K. Tse
Breast Cancer: In Vivo Proton MR Spectroscopy in the Characterization of Histopathologic Subtypes and Preliminary Observations in Axillary Node Metastases
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 190 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CA Cancer J ClinHome page
M. Morrow, E. A. Strom, L. W. Bassett, D. D. Dershaw, B. Fowble, J. R. Harris, F. O'Malley, S. J. Schnitt, S. E. Singletary, and D. P. Winchester
Standard for the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast (DCIS)
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2002; 52(5): 256 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
G. F. Tillman, S. G. Orel, M. D. Schnall, D. J. Schultz, J. E. Tan, and L. J. Solin
Effect of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging on the Clinical Management of Women With Early-Stage Breast Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2002; 20(16): 3413 - 3423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. C. Siegmann, M. Muller-Schimpfle, F. Schick, C. T. Remy, N. Fersis, P. Ruck, C. Gorriz, and C. D. Claussen
MR Imaging--Detected Breast Lesions: Histopathologic Correlation of Lesion Characteristics and Signal Intensity Data
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1403 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. L. McKnight, J. L. Kugel, P. J. Rossman, A. Manduca, L. C. Hartmann, and R. L. Ehman
MR Elastography of Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1411 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall
MR Imaging of the Breast for the Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Breast Cancer
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 13 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
D. K. W. Yeung, H. S. Cheung, and G. M. K. Tse
Human Breast Lesions: Characterization with Contrast-enhanced in Vivo Proton MR Spectroscopy—Initial Results
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 40 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
K. A. Kvistad, J. Rydland, J. Vainio, H. B. Smethurst, S. Lundgren, H. E. Fjøsne, and O. Haraldseth
Breast Lesions: Evaluation with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging and with T2*-weighted First-Pass Perfusion MR Imaging
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 545 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
I.-M. A. Obdeijn, E. M. J. Brouwers-Kuyper, M. M. A. Tilanus-Linthorst, T. Wiggers, and M. Oudkerk
MR Imaging-Guided Sonography Followed by Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in Occult Carcinoma of the Breast
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 1079 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
J. M. Hrung, C. P. Langlotz, S. G. Orel, K. R. Fox, M. D. Schnall, and J. S. Schwartz
Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging and Core-Needle Biopsy in the Preoperative Work-up of Suspicious Breast Lesions
Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 39 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
S. G. Orel
Differentiating Benign from Malignant Enhancing Lesions Identified at MR Imaging of the Breast: Are Time–Signal Intensity Curves an Accurate Predictor?
Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 5 - 7.
[Full Text]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
D. Weinstein, S. Strano, P. Cohen, S. Fields, J. M. Gomori, and H. Degani
Breast Fibroadenoma: Mapping of Pathophysiologic Features with Three-Time-Point, Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging—Pilot Study
Radiology, January 1, 1999; 210(1): 233 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.