Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Holsbeeck, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bouffard, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Holsbeeck, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bouffard, J. A.

Radiology, Vol 197, 443-446, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

US depiction of partial-thickness tear of the rotator cuff

MT van Holsbeeck, PA Kolowich, WR Eyler, JG Craig, KK Shirazi, GK Habra, GM Vanderschueren and JA Bouffard
Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.

PURPOSE: To test previously defined ultrasound (US) criteria for identification of partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Before shoulder arthroscopy, 52 patients with shoulder pain for more than 3 months were examined with a 7.5-MHz commercially available linear-array transducer and a standardized study protocol. The criteria used to detect partial-thickness tears were (a) a mixed hyper- and hypoechoic focus in the crucial zone of the supraspinatus tendon and (b) a hypoechoic lesion visualized in two orthogonal imaging planes with either articular or bursal extension. RESULTS: The US findings were reported as partial-thickness tears in 17 shoulders, of which three were false-positive findings. There was one false-negative finding. The sensitivity of US in depiction of partial- thickness tears was 93%, and specificity was 94%. The positive predictive value was 82%, and the negative predictive value was 98%. CONCLUSION: US can depict most partial-thickness tears with use of the criteria described.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
A. Al-Shawi, R. Badge, and T. Bunker
The detection of full thickness rotator cuff tears using ultrasound
J Bone Joint Surg Br, July 1, 2008; 90-B(7): 889 - 892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. Anderson, M. Boothby, D. Aschenbrener, and M. van Holsbeeck
Outcome and Structural Integrity After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using 2 Rows of Fixation: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2006; 34(12): 1899 - 1905.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. J. C. M. Rutten, G. J. Jager, and J. G. Blickman
From the RSNA Refresher Courses: US of the Rotator Cuff: Pitfalls, Limitations, and Artifacts.
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2006; 26(2): 589 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. Fealy, R. S. Adler, M. C. Drakos, A. M. Kelly, A. A. Allen, F. A. Cordasco, R. F. Warren, and S. J. O'Brien
Patterns of Vascular and Anatomical Response After Rotator Cuff Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2006; 34(1): 120 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Papatheodorou, P. Ellinas, F. Takis, A. Tsanis, I. Maris, and N. Batakis
US of the Shoulder: Rotator Cuff and Non-Rotator Cuff Disorders
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2006; 26(1): e23 - e23.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. B. Moosikasuwan, T. T. Miller, and B. J. Burke
Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical, Radiographic, and US Findings
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1591 - 1607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. J. Matava, D. B. Purcell, and J. R. Rudzki
Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2005; 33(9): 1405 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C. Charousset, L. Bellaiche, L. D. Duranthon, and J. Grimberg
Accuracy of CT arthrography in the assessment of tears of the rotator cuff
J Bone Joint Surg Br, June 1, 2005; 87-B(6): 824 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. A. Teefey, W. D. Middleton, W. T. Payne, and K. Yamaguchi
Detection and Measurement of Rotator Cuff Tears with Sonography: Analysis of Diagnostic Errors
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1768 - 1773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. D. Middleton, S. A. Teefey, and K. Yamaguchi
Sonography of the Rotator Cuff: Analysis of Interobserver Variability
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1465 - 1468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. A. Teefey, D. A. Rubin, W. D. Middleton, C. F. Hildebolt, R. A. Leibold, and K. Yamaguchi
Detection and Quantification of Rotator Cuff Tears. Comparison of Ultrasonographic, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Arthroscopic Findings in Seventy-one Consecutive Cases
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 708 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. S. Churchill, E. V. Fehringer, T. J. Dubinsky, and F. A. Matsen III
Rotator Cuff Ultrasonography: Diagnostic Capabilities
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2004; 12(1): 6 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
S Ostlere
Imaging the shoulder
Imaging, December 1, 2003; 15(4): 162 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of a Shoulder Ultrasound Examination
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2003; 22(10): 1137 - 1141.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
J R C Ellis, J L Teh, and P M Scott
Ultrasound of tendons
Imaging, June 1, 2002; 14(3): 223 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
E Naredo, P Aguado, E De Miguel, J Uson, L Mayordomo, J Gijon-Banos, and E Martin-Mola
Painful shoulder: comparison of physical examination and ultrasonographic findings
Ann Rheum Dis, February 1, 2002; 61(2): 132 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. V. Hammar, G. B. Wintzell, K. G. O. Åström, S. Larsson, and A. Elvin
Role of US in the Preoperative Evaluation of Patients with Anterior Shoulder Instability
Radiology, April 1, 2001; 219(1): 29 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Lin, J. A. Jacobson, D. P. Fessell, W. J. Weadock, and C. W. Hayes
An Illustrated Tutorial of Musculoskeletal Sonography: Part 2, Upper Extremity
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1071 - 1079.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Feldman
Musculoskeletal Radiology: Then and Now
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 309 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. J. Seibold, T. A. Mallisee, S. J. Erickson, M. D. Boynton, W. G. Raasch, and M. E. Timins
Rotator Cuff: Evaluation with US and MR Imaging
RadioGraphics, May 1, 1999; 19(3): 685 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
E Alasaarela, J Leppilahti, and M Hakala
Ultrasound and operative evaluation of arthritic shoulder joints
Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 1998; 57(6): 357 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.