Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fukuya, T.
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fukuya, T.
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, K.

Radiology, Vol 197, 705-711, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Lymph-node metastases: efficacy for detection with helical CT in patients with gastric cancer

T Fukuya, H Honda, T Hayashi, K Kaneko, Y Tateshi, T Ro, Y Maehara, M Tanaka, M Tsuneyoshi and K Masuda
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of helical computed tomography (CT) in the detection of lymphadenopathy in patients with gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Helical CT (5-mm section thickness, 5-mm/sec table incrementation) was performed in 58 patients (39 men, 19 women; mean age, 63.8 years) with gastric cancer; 1,082 lymph nodes (138 positive, 944 negative for metastasis) were resected at surgery. Findings at CT and resection were compared. Sensitivity for detecting lymph nodes was evaluated according to nodal size and presence of metastasis. RESULTS: Seven (1.1%) of 649 lymph nodes 1-4 mm, 160 (45.1%) of 355 nodes 5-9 mm, and 56 (72%) of 78 nodes larger than 9 mm were detected at CT. For nodes of at least 5 mm, sensitivity for detecting metastasis-positive nodes (79 [75.2%] of 105 nodes) was higher than that for detecting metastasis-negative nodes (137 [41.8%] of 328; P < .01). Differences between positive and negative nodes in CT attenuation (110 HU +/- 25 vs 66 HU +/- 32) and short-to-long axis ratios (0.81 +/- 0.15 vs 0.57 +/- 0.15; P < .001) were significant. CONCLUSION: Helical CT is effective for detection of metastatic lymphadenopathy from gastric cancer. CT attenuation and lymph-node configuration aid in diagnosis of malignant adenopathy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C.-Y. Chen, J.-S. Hsu, D.-C. Wu, W.-Y. Kang, J.-S. Hsieh, T.-S. Jaw, M.-T. Wu, and G.-C. Liu
Gastric Cancer: Preoperative Local Staging with 3D Multi-Detector Row CT--Correlation with Surgical and Histopathologic Results
Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 472 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. S. Lim, M. J. Yun, M.-J. Kim, W. J. Hyung, M.-S. Park, J.-Y. Choi, T.-S. Kim, J. D. Lee, S. H. Noh, and K. W. Kim
CT and PET in Stomach Cancer: Preoperative Staging and Monitoring of Response to Therapy
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 143 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. J. Kim, A. Y. Kim, S. T. Oh, J.-S. Kim, K. W. Kim, P. N. Kim, M.-G. Lee, and H. K. Ha
Gastric Cancer Staging at Multi-Detector Row CT Gastrography: Comparison of Transverse and Volumetric CT Scanning
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 879 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. V. Sahani, S. P. Kalva, L. M. Hamberg, P. F. Hahn, C. G. Willett, S. Saini, P. R. Mueller, and T.-Y. Lee
Assessing Tumor Perfusion and Treatment Response in Rectal Cancer with Multisection CT: Initial Observations
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 785 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. R. Habermann, F. Weiss, R. Riecken, H. Honarpisheh, S. Bohnacker, C. Staedtler, C. Dieckmann, V. Schoder, and G. Adam
Preoperative Staging of Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Comparison of Helical CT and Endoscopic US
Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 465 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. Ba-Ssalamah, M. Prokop, M. Uffmann, P. Pokieser, B. Teleky, and G. Lechner
Dedicated Multidetector CT of the Stomach: Spectrum of Diseases
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2003; 23(3): 625 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K A Miles and M R Griffiths
Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement?
Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2003; 76(904): 220 - 231.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J C Clarke, K Cranley, B E Kelly, K Bell, and P H S Smith
Provision of MRI can significantly reduce CT collective dose
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2001; 74(886): 926 - 931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. T. Yang, W. W. M. Lam, M. Y. Yu, T. H. Cheung, and C. Metreweli
Comparison of Dynamic Helical CT and Dynamic MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Cervical Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 759 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
J Davies, A G Chalmers, H M Sue-Ling, J May, G V Miller, I G Martin, and D Johnston
Spiral computed tomography and operative staging of gastric carcinoma: a comparison with histopathological staging
Gut, September 1, 1997; 41(3): 314 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.