Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemerink, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by van Engelshoven, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kemerink, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by van Engelshoven, J. M.

Radiology, Vol 197, 749-752, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Scanner conformity in CT densitometry of the lungs

GJ Kemerink, RJ Lamers, GR Thelissen and JM van Engelshoven
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.

PURPOSE: To quantify inter- and intrascanner conformity in computed tomographic (CT) densitometry of the lungs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With six scanners from four manufacturers, a lung densitometry protocol with several variations was applied for performance comparison. Phantoms included water, air, and a humanoid thorax phantom equipped with a dog lung and exchangeable pseudolungs of polyethylene foam. RESULTS: All scanners produced acceptable CT numbers (Hounsfield units) for water, but some not for air. An incorrect calibration of air density affected all CT numbers at lung densities, but the error was easily correctable. Some systems were more sensitive to object size than others were. Sensitivity of CT numbers to section thickness, reconstruction filter, zoom factor, and table height was small, except for two scanners in relation to section thickness. CONCLUSION: After correction for poor air calibration, scanner conformity was acceptable when the reproducibility of lung densitometry in clinical practice was set as a reference.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
B. C. Stoel, F. Bode, A. Rames, S. Soliman, J. H. C. Reiber, and J. Stolk
Quality Control in Longitudinal Studies with Computed Tomographic Densitometry of the Lungs
Proceedings of the ATS, December 15, 2008; 5(9): 929 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
B. D. Patel, H. O. Coxson, S. G. Pillai, A. G. N. Agusti, P. M. A. Calverley, C. F. Donner, B. J. Make, N. L. Muller, S. I. Rennard, J. Vestbo, et al.
Airway Wall Thickening and Emphysema Show Independent Familial Aggregation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2008; 178(5): 500 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. Cazzola, W. MacNee, F. J. Martinez, K. F. Rabe, L. G. Franciosi, P. J. Barnes, V. Brusasco, P. S. Burge, P. M. A. Calverley, B. R. Celli, et al.
Outcomes for COPD pharmacological trials: from lung function to biomarkers
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2008; 31(2): 416 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
R. Yuan, J. R. Mayo, J. C. Hogg, P. D. Pare, A. M. McWilliams, S. Lam, and H. O. Coxson
The Effects of Radiation Dose and CT Manufacturer on Measurements of Lung Densitometry
Chest, August 1, 2007; 132(2): 617 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. L. Ford, E. L. Martin, J. F. Lewis, R. A. W. Veldhuizen, M. Drangova, and D. W. Holdsworth
In vivo characterization of lung morphology and function in anesthetized free-breathing mice using micro-computed tomography
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2007; 102(5): 2046 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
B. A. Simon, G. E. Christensen, D. A. Low, and J. M. Reinhardt
Computed Tomography Studies of Lung Mechanics
Proceedings of the ATS, December 1, 2005; 2(6): 517 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. S. Title, K. Harper, E. Nelson, T. Evans, and R. Tello
Observer Performance in Assessing Anemia on Thoracic CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1240 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. G. Parr, B. C. Stoel, J. Stolk, P. G. Nightingale, and R. A. Stockley
Influence of Calibration on Densitometric Studies of Emphysema Progression Using Computed Tomography
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2004; 170(8): 883 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. L. Boedeker, M. F. McNitt-Gray, S. R. Rogers, D. A. Truong, M. S. Brown, D. W. Gjertson, and J. G. Goldin
Emphysema: Effect of Reconstruction Algorithm on CT Imaging Measures
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 295 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. G. Parr, R. A. Stockley, A. Best, and D. Lynch
Standardization of CT Densitometry [letter] * Drs Best and Lynch respond:
Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 887 - 887.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. J. Park, C. J. Bergin, and J. L. Clausen
Quantitation of Emphysema with Three-dimensional CT Densitometry: Comparison with Two-dimensional Analysis, Visual Emphysema Scores, and Pulmonary Function Test Results
Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 541 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. D. BECKER, Y. M. BERKMEN, J. H. M. AUSTIN, I. K. MUN, B. M. ROMNEY, A. ROZENSHTEIN, P. A. JELLEN, C. K. YIP, B. THOMASHOW, and M. E. GINSBURG
Lung Volumes before and after Lung Volume Reduction Surgery . Quantitative CT Analysis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 1997; 157(5): 1593 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1995 by the Radiological Society of North America.