Radiology, Vol 197, 826-830, Copyright © 1995 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Anterior cruciate ligament tear: prospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of middle- and high-field-strength MR imaging at 1.5 and 0.5 T

AD Vellet, DH Lee, PL Munk, L Hewett, M Eliasziw, S Dunlavy, L Vidito, PJ Fowler, A Miniaci and A Amendola
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of current-generation middle- and high-field-strength magnetic resonance (MR) imagers in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 114 of 230 patients referred for knee imaging, MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T was performed with identical sequences but with a slightly longer total imaging time and bandwidth optimization at 0.5 T. Radiologists were blinded to diagnosis and field strength. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were determined, and ACL tear was confirmed by means of arthroscopy and pathology. RESULTS: There was no difference between the field strengths in accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity for the diagnosis of ACL tears in 86 patients with disrupted ACLs and 28 patients with intact ACLs. Accuracy for all ACL tears was 90% at 0.5 T and 91% at 1.5 T. Similarly, there were no differences in diagnosis of meniscal tears (79 with, 149 without) or posterior cruciate ligament tears (seven with, 107 without). CONCLUSION: Higher field strength does not confer higher accuracy in the diagnosis of ACL tears at MR imaging.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. H. G. Oei, J. J. Nikken, A. Z. Ginai, G. P. Krestin, J. A. N. Verhaar, A. B. van Vugt, and M. G. M. Hunink Acute Knee Trauma: Value of a Short Dedicated Extremity MR Imaging Examination for Prediction of Subsequent Treatment Radiology, January 1, 2005; 234(1): 125 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Jackson, P. G. O'Malley, and K. Kroenke Evaluation of Acute Knee Pain in Primary Care Ann Intern Med, October 7, 2003; 139(7): 575 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. W. J. Vincken, B. P. M. ter Braak, A. R. van Erkell, T. P. W. de Rooy, W. M. C. Mallens, W. Post, and J. L. Bloem Effectiveness of MR Imaging in Selection of Patients for Arthroscopy of the Knee Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 739 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Vande Berg, F. E. Lecouvet, P. Poilvache, J.-E. Dubuc, B. Maldague, and J. Malghem Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Associated Meniscal Lesions: Assessment at Dual-Detector Spiral CT Arthrography Radiology, May 1, 2002; (2002) 2232011024. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Cotten, E. Delfaut, X. Demondion, F. Lapegue, M. Boukhelifa, N. Boutry, P. Chastanet, and F. Gougeon MR Imaging of the Knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T: Correlation with Surgery Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 1093 - 1097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Maubon, J.-M. Ferru, V. Berger, M. C. Soulage, M. DeGraef, P. Aubas, P. Coupeau, E. Dumont, and J.-P. Rouanet Effect of Field Strength on MR Images: Comparison of the Same Subject at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 T RadioGraphics, July 1, 1999; 19(4): 1057 - 1067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Vande Berg, F. E. Lecouvet, P. Poilvache, J.-E. Dubuc, B. Maldague, and J. Malghem Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Associated Meniscal Lesions: Assessment at Dual-Detector Spiral CT Arthrography Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 403 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]