Radiology, Vol 198, 131-135, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations

JA Baker, PJ Kornguth, JY Lo and CE Floyd Jr
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance and inter- and intraobserver variability of an artificial neural network (ANN) for predicting breast biopsy outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five radiologists described 60 mammographically detected lesions with the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) nomenclature. A previously programmed ANN used the BI-RADS descriptors and patient histories to predict biopsy results. ANN predictive performance was compared with the clinical decision to perform biopsy. Inter- and intraobserver variability of radiologists' interpretations and ANN predictions were evaluated with Cohen kappa analysis. RESULTS: The ANN maintained 100% sensitivity (23 of 23 cancers) while improving the positive predictive value of biopsy results from 38% (23 of 60 lesions) to between 58% (23 of 40 lesions) and 66% (23 of 35 lesions; P < .001). Interobserver variability for interpretation of the lesions was significantly reduced by the ANN (P < .001); there was no statistically significant effect on nearly perfect intraobserver reproducibility. CONCLUSION: Use of an ANN with radiologists' descriptions of abnormal findings may improve interpretation of mammographic abnormalities.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A Karahaliou, S Skiadopoulos, I Boniatis, P Sakellaropoulos, E Likaki, G Panayiotakis, and L Costaridou Texture analysis of tissue surrounding microcalcifications on mammograms for breast cancer diagnosis Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2007; 80(956): 648 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Y. Lo, M. K. Markey, J. A. Baker, and C. E. Floyd Jr. Cross-Institutional Evaluation of BI-RADS Predictive Model for Mammographic Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 457 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Floyd Jr., J. Y. Lo, and G. D. Tourassi Case-Based Reasoning Computer Algorithm that Uses Mammographic Findings for Breast Biopsy Decisions Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1347 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-P. Chan, B. Sahiner, M. A. Helvie, N. Petrick, M. A. Roubidoux, T. E. Wilson, D. D. Adler, C. Paramagul, J. S. Newman, and S. Sanjay-Gopal Improvement of Radiologists' Characterization of Mammographic Masses by Using Computer-aided Diagnosis: An ROC Study Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 817 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. J. Fultz, C. V. Jacobs, W. J. Hall, R. Gottlieb, D. Rubens, S. M. S. Totterman, S. Meyers, C. Angel, G. D. Priore, D. P. Warshal, et al. Ovarian Cancer: Comparison of Observer Performance for Four Methods of Interpreting CT Scans Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 401 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G. D. Tourassi and C. E. Floyd The Effect of Data Sampling on the Performance Evaluation of Artificial Neural Networks in Medical Diagnosis Med Decis Making, April 1, 1997; 17(2): 186 - 192. [Abstract] [PDF]