Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vinnicombe, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Husband, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vinnicombe, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Husband, J. E.

Radiology, Vol 198, 333-340, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Primary breast cancer: mammographic changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with pathologic correlation

SJ Vinnicombe, AD MacVicar, RL Guy, JP Sloane, TJ Powles, G Knee and JE Husband
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England.

PURPOSE: To correlate changes depicted at mammography during neo- adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma with subsequent pathologic status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 107) underwent mammography before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, prior to surgery. Four retrospectively determined grades of response at mammography included complete, mammographic (decreased size and/or density), stable disease, or progressive disease. RESULTS: In 95 fully assessable patients, grade of response to chemotherapy was complete in eight (9%), mammographic in 78 (82%), stable disease in seven (7%), and progressive disease in two (2%). Before and after treatment, respectively, 64 (67%) and 20 (21%) masses were greater than 2 cm in bidimensional diameter. Response was not complete in any of the 44 (46%) cases of microcalcifications. At histologic examination after surgery in 95 fully assessable patients, five of eight patients with complete response were found to have residual tumor (three with an invasive component); eight were found to have no residual tumor (response in three was complete; in four, mammographic; and in one, stable disease). CONCLUSION: Whereas mammograms in most patients showed some response to chemotherapy, prediction of pathologic outcome was not possible.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
D. J. Hsiang, M. Yamamoto, R. S. Mehta, M.-Y. Su, C. H. Baick, K. T. Lane, and J. A. Butler
Predicting Nodal Status Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With and Without Sequential Trastuzumab
Arch Surg, September 1, 2007; 142(9): 855 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Cerussi, D. Hsiang, N. Shah, R. Mehta, A. Durkin, J. Butler, and B. J. Tromberg
Predicting response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using diffuse optical spectroscopy
PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 4014 - 4019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Rousseau, A. Devillers, C. Sagan, L. Ferrer, B. Bridji, L. Campion, M. Ricaud, E. Bourbouloux, I. Doutriaux, M. Clouet, et al.
Monitoring of Early Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II and III Breast Cancer by [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 24(34): 5366 - 5372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Semple, R. Staff, S. Heys, T. Redpath, A. Welch, T. Ahearn, A. Hutcheon, and F. Gilbert
Baseline MRI delivery characteristics predict change in invasive ductal breast carcinoma PET metabolism as a result of primary chemotherapy administration
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2006; 17(9): 1393 - 1398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Meisamy, P. J. Bolan, E. H. Baker, R. L. Bliss, E. Gulbahce, L. I. Everson, M. T. Nelson, T. H. Emory, T. M. Tuttle, D. Yee, et al.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Predicting Response with in Vivo 1H MR Spectroscopy--A Pilot Study at 4 T
Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 424 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S.-J. Kim, S.-k. Kim, E. S. Lee, J. Ro, and S. h. Kang
Predictive value of [18F]FDG PET for pathological response of breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2004; 15(9): 1352 - 1357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. J. Biersack and H. Palmedo
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Is PET Useful for Monitoring Primary Chemotherapy?
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1815 - 1817.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. C. A. Michel, T. M. Keller, J. M. Frohlich, D. Fink, R. Caduff, B. Seifert, B. Marincek, and R. A. Kubik-Huch
Preoperative Breast Cancer Staging: MR Imaging of the Axilla with Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Enhancement
Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 527 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
I. Gunhan-Bilgen, E. E. Ustun, and A. Memis
Inflammatory Breast Carcinoma: Mammographic, Ultrasonographic, Clinical, and Pathologic Findings in 142 Cases
Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 829 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. A. van der Hage, C. J.H. van de Velde, J.-P. Julien, M. Tubiana-Hulin, C. Vandervelden, and L. Duchateau
Preoperative Chemotherapy in Primary Operable Breast Cancer: Results From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10902
J. Clin. Oncol., November 15, 2001; 19(22): 4224 - 4237.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. M. Dixon, L. Renshaw, C. Bellamy, M. Stuart, G. Hoctin-Boes, and W. R. Miller
The Effects of Neoadjuvant Anastrozole (Arimidex) on Tumor Volume in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Center Study
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2000; 6(6): 2229 - 2235.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Schelling, N. Avril, J. Nahrig, W. Kuhn, W. Romer, D. Sattler, M. Werner, J. Dose, F. Janicke, H. Graeff, et al.
Positron Emission Tomography Using [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for Monitoring Primary Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2000; 18(8): 1689 - 1695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. P. Braeuning, E. T. Burke, and E. D. Pisano
Embolization Coils as Tumor Markers for Mammography in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 251 - 252.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. von Minckwitz, S. D. Costa, W. Eiermann, J.-U. Blohmer, A. H. Tulusan, C. Jackisch, and M. Kaufmann
Maximized Reduction of Primary Breast Tumor Size Using Preoperative Chemotherapy With Doxorubicin and Docetaxel
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 1999; 17(7): 1999 - 1999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.