|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 198, 333-340, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
SJ Vinnicombe, AD MacVicar, RL Guy, JP Sloane, TJ Powles, G Knee and JE Husband
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England.
PURPOSE: To correlate changes depicted at mammography during neo- adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma with subsequent pathologic status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 107) underwent mammography before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, prior to surgery. Four retrospectively determined grades of response at mammography included complete, mammographic (decreased size and/or density), stable disease, or progressive disease. RESULTS: In 95 fully assessable patients, grade of response to chemotherapy was complete in eight (9%), mammographic in 78 (82%), stable disease in seven (7%), and progressive disease in two (2%). Before and after treatment, respectively, 64 (67%) and 20 (21%) masses were greater than 2 cm in bidimensional diameter. Response was not complete in any of the 44 (46%) cases of microcalcifications. At histologic examination after surgery in 95 fully assessable patients, five of eight patients with complete response were found to have residual tumor (three with an invasive component); eight were found to have no residual tumor (response in three was complete; in four, mammographic; and in one, stable disease). CONCLUSION: Whereas mammograms in most patients showed some response to chemotherapy, prediction of pathologic outcome was not possible.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Hsiang, M. Yamamoto, R. S. Mehta, M.-Y. Su, C. H. Baick, K. T. Lane, and J. A. Butler Predicting Nodal Status Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With and Without Sequential Trastuzumab Arch Surg, September 1, 2007; 142(9): 855 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cerussi, D. Hsiang, N. Shah, R. Mehta, A. Durkin, J. Butler, and B. J. Tromberg Predicting response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using diffuse optical spectroscopy PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 4014 - 4019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rousseau, A. Devillers, C. Sagan, L. Ferrer, B. Bridji, L. Campion, M. Ricaud, E. Bourbouloux, I. Doutriaux, M. Clouet, et al. Monitoring of Early Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II and III Breast Cancer by [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2006; 24(34): 5366 - 5372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Semple, R. Staff, S. Heys, T. Redpath, A. Welch, T. Ahearn, A. Hutcheon, and F. Gilbert Baseline MRI delivery characteristics predict change in invasive ductal breast carcinoma PET metabolism as a result of primary chemotherapy administration Ann. Onc., September 1, 2006; 17(9): 1393 - 1398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Meisamy, P. J. Bolan, E. H. Baker, R. L. Bliss, E. Gulbahce, L. I. Everson, M. T. Nelson, T. H. Emory, T. M. Tuttle, D. Yee, et al. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Predicting Response with in Vivo 1H MR Spectroscopy--A Pilot Study at 4 T Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 424 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. Kim, S.-k. Kim, E. S. Lee, J. Ro, and S. h. Kang Predictive value of [18F]FDG PET for pathological response of breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy Ann. Onc., September 1, 2004; 15(9): 1352 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Biersack and H. Palmedo Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Is PET Useful for Monitoring Primary Chemotherapy? J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 1815 - 1817. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. A. Michel, T. M. Keller, J. M. Frohlich, D. Fink, R. Caduff, B. Seifert, B. Marincek, and R. A. Kubik-Huch Preoperative Breast Cancer Staging: MR Imaging of the Axilla with Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Enhancement Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 527 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Gunhan-Bilgen, E. E. Ustun, and A. Memis Inflammatory Breast Carcinoma: Mammographic, Ultrasonographic, Clinical, and Pathologic Findings in 142 Cases Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 829 - 838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. van der Hage, C. J.H. van de Velde, J.-P. Julien, M. Tubiana-Hulin, C. Vandervelden, and L. Duchateau Preoperative Chemotherapy in Primary Operable Breast Cancer: Results From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10902 J. Clin. Oncol., November 15, 2001; 19(22): 4224 - 4237. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Dixon, L. Renshaw, C. Bellamy, M. Stuart, G. Hoctin-Boes, and W. R. Miller The Effects of Neoadjuvant Anastrozole (Arimidex) on Tumor Volume in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Center Study Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2000; 6(6): 2229 - 2235. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Schelling, N. Avril, J. Nahrig, W. Kuhn, W. Romer, D. Sattler, M. Werner, J. Dose, F. Janicke, H. Graeff, et al. Positron Emission Tomography Using [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for Monitoring Primary Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2000; 18(8): 1689 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Braeuning, E. T. Burke, and E. D. Pisano Embolization Coils as Tumor Markers for Mammography in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Carcinoma Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2000; 174(1): 251 - 252. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. von Minckwitz, S. D. Costa, W. Eiermann, J.-U. Blohmer, A. H. Tulusan, C. Jackisch, and M. Kaufmann Maximized Reduction of Primary Breast Tumor Size Using Preoperative Chemotherapy With Doxorubicin and Docetaxel J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 1999; 17(7): 1999 - 1999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |